To quote

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "To quote" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to introduce a citation or a direct speech from a source or individual. Example: "To quote the famous author, 'The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today.'"

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

To quote Captain Comics: "Weak".

The New Yorker

To quote del Potro, would be nice.

The New York Times - Sports

To quote Clarence, "Strange, isn't it?

The New York Times

To quote Richie Benaud: safe.

The Guardian - Sport

To quote: "Plug the damn hole".

The New Yorker

To quote Trump, those techniques get information.

The Guardian

To quote Sullivan again, "Caveat emptor".

The New Yorker

To quote Kirstie and Phil: Location.

The Guardian - Sport

To quote Churchill: "Action this day".

The Guardian - Opinion

To quote Woodward.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

To quote LOLcats: orly?

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "To quote" to add authority and credibility to your writing by incorporating expert opinions or evidence from reliable sources.

Common error

Avoid using "To quote" without providing sufficient context about the speaker or the relevance of the quotation. Always introduce the speaker or source and explain why their words are important.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "To quote" functions as a discourse marker, specifically used to introduce a direct quotation from a source. It signals that the following words are not the writer's own but are being borrowed from someone else. This is supported by Ludwig AI's analysis, which confirms its role in citing sources.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "To quote" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to introduce direct quotations, adding authority or emphasis to your writing. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use across various contexts. While versatile, it's most frequently found in News & Media, followed by Science and Formal & Business contexts. When using "To quote", remember to accurately reproduce the original source's words and provide sufficient context for clarity. Alternatives like "in the words of" or "according to" can offer stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Quoting

Focuses on the act of quoting itself, less formal.

In the words of

Emphasizes the speaker or writer whose words are being used.

According to

Attributes information to a source, suitable for factual statements.

As stated by

More formal way to attribute a statement.

To paraphrase

Introduces a summary or restatement of someone else's words.

Citing

Emphasizes giving credit to a source.

To reference

More generic way to point out another source.

As mentioned by

Used when referring to a previous mention of something.

Referencing

Similar to 'citing', but slightly less formal.

To reiterate

Use to introduce a statement previously made.

FAQs

How can I use "To quote" effectively in a sentence?

Begin by introducing the speaker or source, then use "To quote" followed by the exact words you are citing. For example, "As Albert Einstein said, to quote, "The important thing is not to stop questioning."

What are some alternatives to "To quote" that I can use?

You can use alternatives like "in the words of", "according to", or "as stated by" depending on the context.

Is it necessary to provide context when using "To quote"?

Yes, it's crucial to provide context. Explain who is being quoted and why their words are relevant to your discussion. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

How does "To quote" differ from paraphrasing?

"To quote" introduces the exact words of someone else, enclosed in quotation marks. Paraphrasing, on the other hand, involves restating someone else's ideas in your own words without quotation marks.