To obliterated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "To obliterated" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "To obliterate"? If this is the case, you can use it when referring to the act of completely destroying or erasing something. Example: "The storm threatened to obliterate the small coastal town, leaving nothing but debris in its wake."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It seemed even fewer far-right voices of concern were raised on Wednesday when Fox decided to obliterated all journalism guidelines and actively campaign against Obama with the in-house production of a scathing attack ad.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Is it worth risking the obliteration of the world to obliterate Obama's second term?

The New York Times

It tends to obliterate personality.

The New Yorker

They were hard to obliterate.

The Guardian - Arts

History, memory, is so easy to obliterate.

The Guardian

To "obliterate" it — a total victory.

The Washington Post

"To obliterate real works of the Canadian imagination is to obliterate ourselves," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

What matters is to obliterate the self".

The New York Times - Books

This was designed to obliterate the axillary space after dissection.

The Breast

Mr Benn's aim is to obliterate democracy".

Independent

Globalisation was supposed to obliterate family firms' comfy business models.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the infinitive form "to obliterate" when expressing the intention or action of completely destroying something. The past participle "obliterated" requires a helping verb.

Common error

Avoid using "obliterated" directly after "to". Remember that "to" is usually followed by the base form of the verb (e.g., "to obliterate"), not the past participle.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to obliterated" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "to obliterate", where "to" precedes the base form of the verb. Ludwig AI identifies this as an error, recommending the infinitive form.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to obliterated" is grammatically incorrect; the correct infinitive form is "to obliterate". As highlighted by Ludwig, this error involves using the past participle instead of the base form of the verb after "to". While the intended meaning of complete destruction or removal may be understood, the incorrect grammar significantly diminishes clarity and credibility. Pay close attention to verb forms to ensure accuracy in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

To obliterate

Infinitive form of the verb 'obliterate', correcting the grammatical error.

To completely destroy

Emphasizes the thoroughness of destruction.

To wipe out entirely

Focuses on the act of removing something completely.

To erase without a trace

Highlights the lack of remaining evidence after the action.

With the aim of obliterating

Specifies the intention behind an action.

Intending to annihilate

Emphasizes the purpose of causing complete destruction.

In order to eradicate

Highlights a desire to completely eliminate something.

To decimate

Implies a significant reduction or destruction.

With plans to demolish

Focuses on the planning stage of demolition.

To have the ability to shatter

Highlights the capacity to cause something to break into pieces.

FAQs

How to correctly use "to obliterate" in a sentence?

Use "to obliterate" as the infinitive form of the verb. For example, "The goal was "to obliterate" all traces of the past."

What is the difference between "to obliterate" and "to have obliterated"?

"To obliterate" is the infinitive form, expressing intention or possibility. "To have obliterated" indicates a completed action in the past, often in relation to another past event. For instance, "They aimed "to obliterate" the evidence, but it was too late "to have obliterated" it completely."

What are some synonyms for "to obliterate"?

Alternatives include "to erase", "to destroy completely", or "to wipe out", all conveying the sense of complete removal or destruction.

Is it ever correct to say "to obliterated"?

No, "to obliterated" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "to obliterate", where "obliterate" is the base form of the verb used in the infinitive.