Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This is valid, assuming that people use their leeway wisely.
This is valid as far as it goes, but it would be a mistake to regard Chekhov as a purely technical or aesthetic innovator.
This is valid in this framework.
This is valid here, too.
This is valid also for "Darwin 2009".
This is valid for all values of link loss.
This is valid for both platinum and gold electrodes.
This is valid because most 'branches' are usually not navigable.
This is valid for the rest of the dataset.
This is valid for communities with 100 to 500 families.
This is valid for a majority of operations, given that localization immediately precedes fracture.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com