Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This corresponded to in vivo biodistribution findings.
This corresponded to the ground-glass opacities on CT.
This corresponded to higher work outputs, but lower cycle efficiencies.
This corresponded to the site of fluctuant mass noted on palpation.
This corresponded to only minor structural changes in both MoO3 type materials under catalytic reaction conditions.
This corresponded to a more limited range in of regressed contributions to the staining patterns.
This corresponded to a prediction accuracy of 87% with less than 3% false positives.
This corresponded to a false positive rate (FPR) of 6%95%5% CI 0 29%).
This corresponded to a water MIB concentration of between 3.5 and 5.5 ng/L.
This corresponded to a >2-log increase in light output per bacterial cell.
This corresponded to the result described above and in Figure 3.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com