Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
These ratings are not fleeting.
These ratings were not the subject of my article.
These ratings including indoor environmental quality, water efficiency and the sustainability of their sites.
These ratings are by no means scientific.
These ratings were significantly correlated (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001).
These ratings (discussed above) assess the likelihood of default.
These ratings included selecting the item's measured content area and cognitive level.
These ratings were made available to the respondent after their weightings had been elicited.
These ratings were given by both the investigators and the patients/parents.
These ratings provide a relative assessment between ranges in each factor.
These ratings concur with those of the KKL-t (Figure 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com