Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(39)
The MNb(PO4 3 was designed by strictly selecting the structure and the comprising elements and the conductivity reaches the region of the representative divalent oxide anion conductor series.
The MNB convolutional encoder generates R + 1 outputs, of which the first R symbols correspond to the R inputs (systematic part) and the last symbol is a redundant symbol.
The MNB for diagnostic laparoscopy prior to laparotomy was lower than the MNB for direct laparotomy at a willingness to pay for a QALY of both £20 000 and £30 000 (−£1297 versus -£738 and £2167 versus £2633, respectively).
The MNB has been described in representatives of Malacostraca [ 51- 54] and Mystacocarida [ 39], but is missing in all studied representatives of Branchiopoda: Artemia salina[ 55], Leptodora kindtii[ 56], Triops cancriformis[ 41], Leptestheria dahalacensis and Cyclestheria hislopi[ 42].
The MNB for diagnostic laparoscopy prior to laparotomy was significantly higher than those for direct laparotomy at a maximum willingness to pay for a QALY of £30 000 (£2921 (95% CI £2807 to £3035) versus £2633 (95% CI £2516 to £2750)) but at a willingness to pay for a QALY of £20 000 the MNB for diagnostic laparoscopy was numerically higher but the 95% CIs overlapped.
This paper presents in detail the structure and operation of an MNBTC: MNB encoding, trellis termination, Max-Log-MAP decoding adapted to the MNB case.
Similar(21)
The MNB-Pois model defined through Eqs.
Computational issues precluded fitting the MNB-Pois model.
When the data are generated from the MNB-Pois model, the MNB-Pois model had low percent relative median biases for β 1, β 2 and β 3, and the biases appear to decrease as sample sizes increase (Table 4).
The MNB-Pois model gave the best fit (lowest AIC) while its marginal mean model parameter estimates and standard errors were similar in value to those of the next best fitting model, MZINB.
Based on the MNB-Pois model, the estimated caries incidence density ratio for the children who used the NaF toothpaste formulation versus children with the same baseline status of caries and calculus who used SMFP was exp(−0.060)=0.942 (95% CI: 0.874, 1.015; Table 8).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com