Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The errors between the desired and measured accelerations were calculated.
The errors between silicon data and simulation are mainly under 5%.
The errors between experimental data and the obtained ones from this correlation were within 28%.
The errors between day-ahead forecasting and the real-time situation are neglected.
The errors between the predictions and experimental results are less than 10% for all evaluated modes.
The errors between the predicted results and experimental data are small.
The errors between the predicted and actual WT and PV outputs are treated as a fuzzy variables.
The errors between the original CAD design and the FE simulated parts can be characterised in both 2D and 3D spaces.
The errors between numerical solution and exact solution are in the same order of magnitude shown in Figure 2; thus, these results are not presented here.
The errors between the numerical simulations and the actual data are given in Table 6, where we can observe that our discrete model (8) gives an ideal prediction.
The errors between the simulated dynamics and the dynamics of the equivalent model with different orders are also listed in Table 4.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com