The discordance in European and American public views of events in the Middle East has grown ever more evident in recent weeks.
The discordance observed is likely due to several factors.
The discordance rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
The discordance in EGFR mutation status was 28% and that in K-RAS was 24%.
The discordance may be caused by the different stages of progression in different studies.
The discordance in nad1 and nad2 annotation among different species reflects insufficient transcriptome data.
The discordance can be explained by examining the reasons for which the information was collected.
The discordance (disagreement) was 17% and therefore the post-hoc power was 98.7%.
The discordance between these data appears to be a methodological issue.
The discordance rate indicated the actual impact of disruption of recognition site.
The discordance between CPG knowledge, attitude and behavior demands further methodological investigation.
