Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The concordance between the two sources was not close.
The concordance of tests results is shown in Table 17.
The concordance for this model was 0.86.
The concordance of blind duplicates was 99.74%.
The concordance between both studies thus validates our experimental approach.
The concordance rate between FMCA and sequencing results was 100%.
The concordance was >99%.
The concordance ratio was >90%.
The concordance rate was 100%.
The concordance of the model was 83%.
The concordance between replicates was 100%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com