The being of evil is apparent and not real.
The being of material substance which is permanent and discrete is measured by numbers.
The being of essence thus coincides with the possibility, or the ability, to receive actual existence that a purely imagined res does not have.
To be Dasein is to be "the being of the 'between'" (HCT 251/GA20 346 7), as Heidegger first put it in 1925.
In what, then, does the being of being human consist?
This brings us to a very important point: if the being of being human is defined by mineness, then my being is not a matter of indifference to me.
For Aristotle, there is a science that investigates what he calls "being as such", without regard to any specific realms of being, eg the being of living things (biology) or the being of the natural world (physics).
We must distinguish between the nature of God and the nature of things, between that which exists by itself (God) and that which exist by another (the universe), but since the nature of God just is Being itself, no parallel distinction may be drawn between the being of God and the being of things.
Should the artwork be harmed, the being of the correlative is unaffected.
But then, for a member of the series say, A to be, would be for it to have or participate in the being of B; and for B to be, in turn, would be for it to have or participate in the being of C, and so on.
The body, being itself visible, uses its being to participate in the being of the visible world.
