Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(24)
Marilyn tells a bathroom attendant that Maf is "a tiddy biddy little thing who just wants his bed," and he bristles.
I might also point out that Maf, again like me, is almost always the sanest, most reasonable voice in the room.
It is clear that Maf is an urbane dog of unparalleled lineage - given to Monroe by Frank Sinatra, given to Sinatra by Natalie Wood's mother, given to her by Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant, and that his task is to reappraise the last two years of Monroe's life from a dog's-eye view.
One would imagine, then, that Maf's memoirs would reveal Marilyn's elusive heart for the first time.
These results identify enhancer inactivation and disassembly as a mechanism of IFN-γ-mediated gene repression and reveal that MAF regulates the macrophage enhancer landscape and is suppressed by IFN-γ to augment macrophage activation.
To help evaluate how SNPs in probes may impact gene-level summaries, we provide, in each population, the number of affected probesets (i.e., containing probes with novel SNPs such that MAF >5%) within each transcript cluster (Supplemental Tables S8, S9).
Similar(36)
One significant molecular difference between MEFs and MAFs is that MAFs express higher levels of the Wnt regulated transcription factor Lef1, compared to MEFs.
For instance, it has been shown that MAFs of SNPs may reveal some information about genetic architecture [ 28] and random effects need to be defined for SNPs with different spectra of MAFs separately.
However, when β-crystallins are highly expressed in the lens epithelium of infant moles, most of the epithelial cell nuclei appear c-MAF-negative, suggesting that c-MAF is dispensable for β-crystallin expression in the mole.
It should be noted that this MAF criterion refers to the common ancestral population 300 generations back and thus, lower MAF can occur in the reference population.> The additive effect (a) of a QTL, defined as half the difference in genotypic value between alternate homozygotes, was sampled from a gamma distribution (0.4, 1.66).
The power for H0 : OR = 1 vs. H1 : OR = c could be determined provided that the MAF in the control group, p2, and c were known according to the above formula where the MAF in the case group could be calculated as p1 = (OR * p2)/(OR * p2 - p2 + 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com