Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
State legislatures might still have options that courts might not.
Mr. Olson told him that courts had deemed marriage a "fundamental right".
High levels of compensation that courts can award to laid-off workers would be trimmed.
Justice Ginsburg wrote that courts should be judicious in allowing takings claims for flood damage.
Yellow M, like TBWA, favours an aggressive style that courts controversy.
The other is that courts gain legitimacy by explaining the reasoning for their decisions.
They add that courts must protect the fundamental rights of disfavored minorities.
And it asserts that courts should not play a role in reviewing or restraining such decisions.
It's hardly obvious, Ford argues, that courts should treat all of these policies alike.
We all cling to the idea that courts are a place where victims can find justice.
To some degree, it must reflect the fact that courts scrutinize capital cases more closely.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com