Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
Tested my abilities in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "Tested my abilities in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing experiences or challenges that have allowed you to evaluate or improve your skills in a specific area. Example: "During my internship, I tested my abilities in project management by leading a team to complete a major project on time."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Item 13 says "Assessment in English tests my ability to apply learning", item 14 states "Assessment in English examines my ability to answer important questions", and item 12 affirms "English assessment tasks check my understanding of topics".
Science
-.65 T13 Assessment in English tests my ability to apply learning.
Science
I am praised because of my ability in fast analysis of complicated situations.
"Tested my Coke-Mentos rocket there.
News & Media
- Confident in my abilities to be productive as a scientist.
Science & Research
My manager was impressed with my computer skills and my ability to communicate in a clear and business-like manner.
Science & Research
I'm not sure I noticed my newfound cognitive abilities in my everyday life.
News & Media
"I tell people that my ability lies in my mind.
Formal & Business
I trust in my abilities.
News & Media
"I'm very confident in my abilities.
News & Media
"I've stayed confident in my abilities and my beliefs".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "tested my abilities in", clearly specify the context or area in which your abilities were challenged. This adds clarity and impact to your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "tested my abilities in" without mentioning the specific domain or skill being tested. For example, instead of saying "I tested my abilities in the project", specify "I tested my abilities in project management by leading the team".
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "tested my abilities in" functions as a predicate within a sentence, indicating that the subject has undergone a trial or assessment of their skills within a specific domain. Ludwig suggests that it is acceptable to use. However, it is important to provide context to make the sentence more clear.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "tested my abilities in" is grammatically correct and serves to indicate that an individual's capabilities have been evaluated or challenged within a specific domain. Ludwig confirms its usability, it is important to provide clear context when using the phrase. Specifying the area in which your abilities were tested enhances clarity and impact. While the phrase is generally neutral in register, it can be adapted for more formal contexts by using alternatives such as "evaluated my skills in". Although direct examples are missing in the provided data, the phrase remains valuable for highlighting experiences where one's competence was put to the test.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Evaluated my skills in
Replaces "tested" with a more formal term, implying a structured assessment.
Assessed my capabilities in
Similar to "evaluated", but emphasizes inherent potential rather than demonstrated skill.
Applied my skills to
Focuses on the action of using skills rather than the evaluation of them.
Utilized my talents in
Highlights the use of natural aptitudes in a particular area.
Demonstrated my proficiency in
Emphasizes a proven level of competence.
Proved my competence in
Stronger emphasis on having definitively shown one's abilities.
Gained experience in
Focuses on acquiring knowledge and skill through practice.
Honed my skills in
Implies refining and improving existing skills.
Developed my expertise in
Highlights the growth of specialized knowledge and skills.
Practiced my abilities in
Focuses on the act of rehearsal and training in a specific skill set.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "Tested my abilities in" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "evaluated my skills in", "assessed my capabilities in", or "demonstrated my proficiency in".
Is it better to use "tested my abilities at" or "tested my abilities in"?
The choice between "at" and "in" depends on the context. "In" is generally used for broader areas (e.g., "tested my abilities in project management"), while "at" can be used for specific tasks or locations (though less common, e.g., "tested my abilities at solving the puzzle").
What's a good way to follow up after saying "I tested my abilities in"?
After stating "I tested my abilities in", provide details about the situation, the challenges you faced, and the outcomes. This gives context and highlights your accomplishments.
What's the difference between "tested my abilities in" and "applied my skills to"?
"Tested my abilities in" implies an evaluation or challenge of your skills, while "applied my skills to" suggests using existing skills in a specific situation. The former focuses on assessment, and the latter on application.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested