Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Significant pair differences (Bonferroni test): treated group vs children with a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.042).
Significant pair differences (two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test): treated patients vs children with a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.0094) and children without a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.0080).
Significant pair differences (Bonferroni test): treated group vs children with a lateral cross-bite (p < 0.001) and adolescents with a normal occlusion vs both children with a lateral cross-bite (p < 0.001) and children without a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.005).
Significant pair differences (Bonferroni test): treated group vs both children with a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.006) and children without a lateral cross-bite (p = 0.001); adolescents with a normal occlusion vs both children with a lateral cross-bite (p < 0.001) and children without a lateral cross-bite (p < 0.001).
One week after the alloparental test, treated males were tested for heterosexual social preference.
The increase in dry granulation tissue weight in the test treated animals suggests higher protein content.
Similar(50)
The microstructure of the TMCP + T treated sample tempering in the range of 450 to 550 °C for 1 h did not change dramatically yet the lath in the TMCP+RQ+T treated sample merged together and transformed into polygonal ferrite.
Briefly, RNA was isolated from approximately 2×106 purity-sorted cells using RNA-Bee (Tel-Test), treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion) and subsequently re-isolated with the RNA Clean-Up kit (Zymo Research).
Total RNA was extracted from 30 fly heads using RNA STAT-60 (Tel-Test), treated with DNase I (Ambion) to remove potential genomic DNA contamination and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen).
Ten CpG dinucleotide positions were assayed for methylation in the defined region of the Pou5f1 promoter and identified as hypermethylated (>70% methylation) in all cells, comprising DMSO controls, or TSA-, or TSA and T treated GC-1 cells (Figure 6A).
T: treated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com