We used subset D t 1 (D t 2) to estimate model FLU t 1 (FLU t 2).
FLU t 1 and FLU t 2 were nearly identical (correlation ~0.99).
As with Phase I, positive responses 'missed' by ELISPOT were associated with a lower frequency of antigen-specific T cells (FLU), which may be attributed to plating too few cells at set up.
TS was calculated from the equation Using the RM (cubic) method, TS was calculated from the equation In this equation, ν is defined as where flu(t) and fld(t) are fractions of labelled undivided and labelled divided cells, respectively, at post-labelling time t.
Moreover, FLU t 1 and FLU t 2 were highly correlated to FLU (correlation ~0.97).
With 0.4 mg TP/kg-bw/day, using the t-test statistical approach, FLU induced a significant reduction in the TP-stimulated VP weight gain at doses between 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg with the t-test statistical approach, and between 0.3 and 3 mg FLU/kg-bw/day with Dunnett's test.
In our case, flu(t) is the fraction of Slu and G2lu cells, and fld(t) – the fraction of G1ld and Sld cells, respectively, in the total number of cells nt measured per sample.
That doctor didn' t recommend the flu shot.
The variables rain t− i, humid t− i, and ozone t− i refer to rainfall, relative humidity at 0900 hr and ozone on day t− i, respectively; flu t represents the occurrence of influenza epidemics.
