Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This statement isn't technically accurate.
It was factually and technically accurate.
Calling Davis a "diplomat" was, technically, accurate.
What Romney said was technically accurate.
The complaints, though technically accurate, were beside the point.
That may be technically accurate, but it misses the point.
They say things that are technically accurate but misleading.
It's not technically accurate, but conceptually I think it works quite well.
His assertions -- while for the most part technically accurate -- reflect his partisan point of view.
But even if it turns out to be technically accurate, it cannot be candidly accurate.
Even calling her New York's junior senator, while technically accurate, is mildly absurd.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com