Substantiated with me

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Substantiated with me" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning in context. Example: "The evidence must be substantiated with me to ensure its validity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Which is why I feel so strongly about the opinion of the public being pre-shaped by the opinion of those who are supposed to present facts, preferably well-researched, substantiated, with fair context and unenhanced (especially in omission) in the edit suite.

BBC

The need for the AFIP consultation services is further substantiated with the following information.

Huffington Post

This hypothesis is further substantiated with our observation that inhibition of proteasome degradation does not prevent the decrease of Cyclin B1 mRNA levels upon inhibition of transcription, despite preventing the decrease of protein levels.

Plosone

Differing opinions on function innovation have also been articulated, and substantiated with real time evolution experiments.

F1000Research

As it stands, this connection is weak and not substantiated with sufficient evidence.

eLife

Role of CrMPK3 in wounding is further substantiated with wounding induced nuclear localization of CrMPK3-GFP, which is otherwise localized in cytoplasm.

BMC Plant Biology

This needs to be further substantiated with bioinformatic studies of the cis-elements and comparative evaluation of functional effects of the various introns in gene expression.

Genome Biology and Evolution

Enquiry about prodromal symptoms, particularly but not restricted to RBD, can be extremely informative in signposting a DLB diagnosis that can be further substantiated with use of a biomarker appropriate to that stage of disease.

Alzheimer's Research and Therapy

This observation was further substantiated with in vivo data where the authors showed a spatio-temporal PEDF expression that followed the upregulation of VEGF in bile duct ligation (BDL -ligated rats, CCl4-induced cirrhotic livers, and during neoangiogenesis in the mesentery.

Gut

The coupled action of ATM and DNA-PK is further substantiated with the help of gene knockout MEFs: (i) in DNA-PK−/− cells, ATM inhibition prevents the γH2AX generation observed after MNNG addition and, consequently, blocks AIF-mediated chromatinolysis; (ii) in ATM−/− cells, DNA-PK inhibition abolishes both γH2AX generation and PCD.

Cell Death and Disease

The study design of the clinical trials for OLAI and RLAI meant that an adjusted indirect comparison was not possible, so instead relapse and discontinuation rates were taken directly from the clinical trials adjusted for patient years of exposure and substantiated with expert clinical opinion.

BMC Psychiatry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express that something is supported by your verification or personal evidence, rephrase using clearer constructions like "substantiated by me" or "I have substantiated this".

Common error

Avoid using "with" to indicate the source of substantiation when referring to oneself. "With" typically indicates accompaniment or means, not the agent of substantiation. Instead, use "by" or a direct statement of action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantiated with me" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't function properly in a sentence. It appears to attempt indicating personal verification or support, but the preposition "with" is misused. Ludwig AI flags it as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantiated with me" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI confirms that the correct way to indicate that something is supported by your own verification or evidence is to use phrases such as "substantiated by me", "I have substantiated it", or other similar constructions. These alternatives provide clarity and grammatical accuracy, ensuring effective communication in both formal and informal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Substantiated by me

Replaces "with" by "by", focusing on personal provision of substantiation.

Verified by me

Shifts from substantiation to verification, emphasizing personal confirmation.

Confirmed by my evidence

Specifies the method of confirmation as personal evidence.

Supported by my findings

Highlights personal findings as the basis of support.

I have substantiated it

Rephrases to a direct statement of having substantiated something.

I have verified it

Similar to the above, but uses "verified" instead.

I can attest to it

Changes the tone to attestation, a formal declaration of truth.

My research confirms this

Introduces a research context as the source of confirmation.

I personally vouch for it

Emphasizes personal endorsement and guarantee.

The evidence supports my claim

Emphasizes the supporting role of evidence to a personal claim.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something is supported by my verification?

The correct phrasing would be "substantiated by me" or "I have substantiated it". Avoid using "substantiated with me" as it is grammatically incorrect.

What can I say instead of "substantiated with me"?

Consider alternatives such as "verified by me", "confirmed by my evidence", or "supported by my findings" depending on the specific context.

Is "substantiated with me" grammatically correct?

No, "substantiated with me" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct preposition to use in this context is "by". Ludwig AI confirms the incorrectness of this phrase.

How can I express that my research supports a claim?

You can say "My research confirms this" or "The evidence supports my claim" instead of incorrectly using "substantiated with me".