Subsequent analyses

USAGE SUMMARY

"Subsequent analyses" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to analyses that follow an initial study or examination. Example: "Subsequent analyses revealed significant trends in the data." Alternative expressions include "Following analyses" and "Later analyses."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Subsequent analyses found that nearly all the interceptions had failed.

The New York Times

Subsequent analyses by government experts agreed that the clinical trials had flaws in their research methods.

The New York Times

Subsequent analyses in 2014 did report the presence of methane in the Martian atmosphere in one area.

The Guardian

Subsequent analyses were based on nearly 12,000 behavioural observations.

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

Subsequent analyses have shown that those rates of water loss continue into the present.

Huffington Post

Subsequent analyses were age adjusted.

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Subsequent analyses were parametric analyses.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Subsequent analyses included dose duration analyses.

BMJ Open

Subsequent analyses were performed using Excel (Microsoft).

Development (Cambridge)

Subsequent analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0.

Child and Youth Care Forum

Subsequent analyses were run in SPSS 17.0.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "subsequent analyses", ensure the temporal relationship with the initial analysis is clear to the reader. Explicitly state what prompted the need for these additional analyses.

Common error

Avoid using "subsequent analyses" without providing sufficient context about the initial analysis. Clearly define what the initial analysis was and why further examination was necessary. Providing this context allows the reader to properly understand why it exists.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequent analyses" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to analytical processes that occur after an initial analysis, expanding upon or clarifying earlier findings. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is considered good and correct English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "subsequent analyses" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that refers to analyses conducted after an initial assessment. Ludwig AI confirms this. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, its purpose is to provide a more detailed or expanded understanding of a subject matter. When using this phrase, ensure the context of the initial analysis is clear. Related phrases include "follow-up analyses" and "further analyses". The phrase's formality makes it suitable for professional writing and technical documentation. Given the consistent positive assessment, using "subsequent analyses" is a safe and effective choice in academic and professional writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

follow-up analyses

This alternative directly emphasizes the temporal sequence, highlighting that the analyses are a direct continuation of prior work.

succeeding analyses

This suggests a series of analyses, each following the previous one in a defined sequence.

further analyses

Similar to "additional analyses", but with a stronger connotation of deeper exploration and expansion.

later analyses

A more general term indicating analyses performed at a later time, without necessarily implying a direct connection to previous analyses.

ensuing analyses

Implies that the analyses directly result from a prior event or investigation.

additional analyses

This term focuses on the idea that more analyses were conducted, implying an expansion of the initial investigation.

post-hoc analyses

Specifically refers to analyses conducted after the experiment or study has concluded, often to explore unexpected findings.

concluding analyses

Suggests that these analyses are the final ones performed, drawing the investigation to a close.

secondary analyses

Implies that these analyses are performed using data or results from a primary analysis, potentially with a different focus or question.

subsequent investigations

Broader term that may include analyses, but also other forms of inquiry or examination.

FAQs

How can I use "subsequent analyses" in a sentence?

You can use "subsequent analyses" to refer to analyses that follow an initial study or examination, like in the sentence: "The initial findings were inconclusive, so "subsequent analyses" were conducted to explore the data further."

What is a good alternative to "subsequent analyses"?

Alternatives to "subsequent analyses" include "follow-up analyses", "later analyses", or "further analyses", depending on the specific context.

Is "subsequent analysis" or "subsequent analyses" correct?

"Subsequent analysis" (singular) is correct when referring to a single analysis, while ""subsequent analyses"" (plural) is used when referring to multiple analyses.

What's the difference between "subsequent analyses" and "additional analyses"?

"Subsequent analyses" emphasizes the time sequence (analyses that follow), while "additional analyses" focuses on the quantity or expansion of the initial investigation.