Subject to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Subject to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is conditional or dependent on certain terms or circumstances. Example: "The contract is subject to approval by the board of directors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Subject to copyright.

Independent

Subject to availability.

Independent

Subject to availability and survey.

Independent

Subject to that," the judge said.

The New York Times

Subject to: Ch = I.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

Subject to blackout dates.

Huffington Post

Subject to death.

Huffington Post

(Dates subject to availability).

Independent

It's subject to graffiti.

The New York Times

Medicare subject to limited cuts.

The New York Times

All orders subject to approval.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "Subject to", clearly state the condition or limitation immediately after the phrase to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "Subject to" without explicitly defining what the condition entails, as this can lead to misinterpretations and invalidate agreements or understandings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Subject to" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, indicating that something is conditional or contingent upon a specific factor. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "Subject to" is a very common prepositional phrase used to indicate that something is conditional or dependent on certain terms or circumstances. Ludwig AI confirms that is grammatically correct and usable in written English. As evidenced by examples, it appears most frequently in news, scientific and formal business contexts. When using "Subject to", ensure that the conditions or limitations are clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases include "conditional upon", "dependent on", and "contingent on". While versatile, awareness of context ensures proper usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Conditional upon

Emphasizes the dependence on a specific condition being met.

Dependent on

Highlights the reliance on certain factors or circumstances.

Contingent on

Similar to "dependent on" but often used in more formal contexts.

Provided that

Specifies a condition that must be met for something to happen.

Based on

Indicates a foundation or reason, but can imply conditionality depending on context.

Governed by

Implies that something is controlled or dictated by a specific set of rules or guidelines.

Liable to

Indicates a potential for something to occur, often negative, as a consequence.

At the mercy of

Suggests a lack of control and vulnerability to external forces or conditions.

Ruled by

Highlights a controlling influence or authority, similar to "governed by".

If and only if

Specifies a strict, bidirectional dependence between two conditions.

FAQs

How can I use "Subject to" in a sentence?

Use "Subject to" to indicate that something is conditional or dependent on something else. For instance, "The offer is subject to change without notice."

What phrases are similar to "Subject to"?

You can use alternatives such as "conditional upon", "dependent on", or "contingent on", depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "Subject to" or "Dependent on"?

"Subject to" and "Dependent on" are both suitable for formal and informal contexts, though "Subject to" may be perceived as slightly more formal in certain situations.

What's the difference between "Subject to" and "Governed by"?

"Subject to" indicates conditionality or dependence, while "Governed by" /s/ruled+by indicates control or regulation by specific rules or guidelines. "Ruled by" refers to more direct, controlling influence than "Subject to".