Struck again

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Struck again" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate that someone or something has been affected or impacted once more, often in a negative or surprising way. Example: "After the storm passed, the town was struck again by another wave of flooding." Alternative expressions include "hit again" and "affected again."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

General

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He struck again.

The Guardian

Then cancer struck again.

The New York Times

The Curse had struck again.

Independent

The fungus has struck again.

The New York Times - Arts

Now it has struck again.

The New York Times

I'd been struck again.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A pike struck again.

The New York Times - Sports

Then Serunkuma struck again.

The Guardian

On Monday, Mr. Grassley struck again.

The New York Times

The fallible computer has struck again.

The New York Times

The great god Autocorrect has struck again.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "Struck again" to emphasize the repeated nature of an event, especially when it carries negative or impactful consequences. This adds a sense of drama or urgency to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "Struck again" for trivial repetitions. It's best suited for situations involving significant impact or consequence, not everyday occurrences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Struck again" primarily functions as a verb phrase, typically used as a predicate in a sentence. It indicates the recurrence of an action or event, often with emphasis on its impact or effect. Ludwig examples confirm this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Sports

15%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "Struck again" is a common and grammatically sound verb phrase used to indicate the recurrence of an event. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is predominantly found in News & Media and Sports contexts. While versatile, it is best reserved for situations where the repetition carries significance or impact. When aiming for higher formality, consider alternative expressions such as "reoccurred". The linguistic analysis underscores its function as a predicate, its neutral register, and the varied contexts in which it is effectively used.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Hit once more

Focuses on the act of hitting or impacting, emphasizing the repetition.

Attacked repeatedly

Highlights the repeated aggressive action.

Befell once more

Emphasizes that something happened again, usually something unfortunate.

Reoccurred

A more formal way of saying something happened again.

Resurfaced

Suggests something that disappeared has come back.

Staged a repeat

Suggests a planned reoccurrence or deliberate action.

Came back around

Implies a cyclical nature or return to a previous state.

Repeated itself

Highlights the identical nature of the second occurrence.

Another round

Suggests a continuation in a series of events.

Happened a second time

A straightforward way of saying something occurred again.

FAQs

How can I use "Struck again" in a sentence?

You can use "Struck again" to indicate that something has happened repeatedly, often with a negative connotation. For example, "The illness "struck again", leaving him bedridden."

What are some alternatives to "Struck again"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "Struck again" include phrases like "hit once more", "attacked repeatedly", or "reoccurred".

Is it appropriate to use "Struck again" in formal writing?

While "Struck again" is acceptable in formal writing, consider the tone and context. In very formal or academic writing, a more neutral alternative like "reoccurred" might be more suitable.

What does "Struck again" imply about the event?

"Struck again" typically implies that an event has recurred, often unexpectedly and with negative consequences. It emphasizes the repetitive nature of the impact.