Some provided free snacks, and at least one served up a lavish banquet.
Some provided psycho-social support, others food assistance; some received international funding, others did not.
Some provided capabilities that Boeing could have readily obtained from others.
Some provided approximate figures out of concern to avoid identification of the children.
Some provided modelling based on extreme scenarios – one in 1,000 years or the "probable maximum flood" – while others stuck to the "one-in-100-year" designation.
Some provided copies of e-mails they exchanged in the final hours of the case, as they pushed back against the government's response to the jury's last question.
Some provided a market for Soviet-era factories' products or convinced company managers to turn control over to them.
Some provided harsh criticism, while others made excuses.
Some provided trenchant critiques of our current moment, while others created memorials to those we have lost, or dreams of what our movement and world could be.
Some provided a clear label for their style, for example: "paternalistic" (Surgeon A).
