Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Significant preference heterogeneity was observed in flexibility (Wald test P < 0.01).
There was no significant preference for gender.
showed a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine.
Of eight categories, there were four that indicated a statistically significant preference for the TEMPO+, and one indicating a statistically significant preference for the CIS PRO+.
No statistically significant preference was detected for gold, titanium or SiO2 surfaces.
There was a significant preference towards the comfort and applicability of the prototypes (p<0.01).
For the questionnaire results overall, there was a significant preference for the TEMPO+.
However, significant preference heterogeneity across respondents with regards to different biosecurity outcomes was observed.
Subjective opinion by the patients indicated statistically significant preference for home injections.
These same females, when treated with saline, demonstrated a significant preference for males singing normal song.
Subjects displayed a significant preference for the variable option in all baseline conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com