Innovative programs are seldom evaluated in a way that allows for meaningful comparisons [ 9– 11], and in rapidly changing health markets, formal evaluations are often too time consuming and costly for new interventions or rapidly evolving organizations [ 7].
Most motor tests seldom contain quality evaluation in the items or criteria.
Such assessments, however, are usually ad hoc, seldom use validated evaluation tools, and infrequently disseminate learning on a broad scale.
FNR is another important parameter to access the power of this method, and due to lack of large-scale validation approach, published reports seldom include the evaluation of FNR.
Evaluations seldom indicated how they were intended to connect to the UNICEF's Mid-Term Review or the Country Program Evaluation.
But when full-blown, the disorders are difficult to characterize and treat, and doctors seldom do careful evaluations, missing or downplaying behavior patterns that underlie problems like depression and anxiety in millions of people.
Moreover, evaluations seldom apply counterfactual analysis, often because of a lack of data, implying that results may be methodologically questioned.
Because of time pressure and the amount of information that has to be processed, one can very seldom make exhaustive evaluations of all options and their possible consequences.
Acoustic analysis is often used in speech evaluation but seldom for the evaluation of oral prostheses designed for reconstruction of surgical defect.
This evaluation is seldom done for wildlife species due to the intrinsic difficulties of working with these species, including difficult access to animals and samples and the fact that collection of samples usually takes place in remote locations, where conditions often are not the most appropriate [11].
