Sacrifice quality for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Sacrifice quality for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing trade-offs or compromises, particularly in contexts where quality is being exchanged for something else, such as cost or speed. Example: "In order to meet the tight deadline, we had to sacrifice quality for speed in our project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Don't sacrifice quality for speed though.

The Guardian

Sometimes, spies have to sacrifice quality for portability.

The New York Times - Tech

"If we try to make more rods, we run the risk of saturating the market, and one would sacrifice quality for quantity".

The New York Times

It must also double-check the quality of each product, which can be exceptionally challenging given that production processes are complex and factories are sometimes known to sacrifice quality for profit.

The New York Times

In housing, there is a concern that the government's drive for more homes will sacrifice quality for quantity, as occurred in the building boom of the 1960s and 70s.

The Guardian

Will interference such as forbidding co-authorship with residents of the state's enemies, as happens in America under the guise of financial sanctions, become the norm An author-pays model is also likely to lower overall quality, as publishers who are willing to sacrifice quality for profit lower standards to gain market share.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

"For years I was willing to sacrifice quality of life for artistic fulfillment -- you know, you find a circle of artists and you scrape by," said Anna Neighbor, a 27-year-old bass player and Williamsburg exile, between sips of Yuengling lager at a bar in the Northern Liberties neighborhood, an artists' enclave north of City Hall.

The New York Times

Some reviewers said he sacrificed quality for quantity, reusing material from book to book.

The New York Times

It is unlikely to have been alone in sacrificing quality for volume.

The Economist

William Eggleston's original plan of exhibiting low-cost prints of the entire series would mean sacrificing quality for scope.

The New York Times - Arts

If the weather trends keep up, he thinks that brewers could potentially just cut back on the amount of hops they use, sacrificing quality for cost.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sacrifice quality for", clearly state what benefit is being gained in exchange for reduced quality. This provides context and justification for the trade-off.

Common error

Don't assume your audience understands why quality is being sacrificed. Always provide a clear rationale to avoid confusion or negative perception.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sacrifice quality for" functions as a verb phrase indicating a deliberate decision to reduce the standard of something to gain another advantage. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "sacrifice quality for" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that indicates a conscious decision to lower standards in exchange for another benefit, such as speed or cost. According to Ludwig, this phrase is most commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts, but it's generally applicable across various registers, maintaining a neutral tone. While the examples might be limited, using it correctly involves clearly stating the reason for the trade-off. Alternatives include "trade quality for" and ""compromise on quality for"", offering nuanced ways to express this common trade-off.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Compromise on quality for

Implies a mutual agreement to reduce quality to achieve something else.

Trade quality for

Suggests an exchange where quality is given up in return for another factor.

Sacrifice excellence for

Similar to the original but emphasizes the loss of superior quality.

Lower standards for

Indicates a deliberate reduction in quality expectations to meet specific goals.

Forgo quality for

Implies willingly giving up quality for another benefit.

Relax quality standards for

Indicates that the required quality level is not strictly enforced, allowing for compromises.

Reduce quality for

Directly states a decrease in quality to accommodate other considerations.

Accept lower quality for

Acknowledges the acceptance of reduced quality as a necessary concession.

Diminish quality for

Highlights the lessening of quality in favor of something else.

Skimp on quality for

Suggests cutting corners to reduce costs, affecting quality.

FAQs

How can I use "sacrifice quality for" in a sentence?

You can use "sacrifice quality for" to describe situations where a higher standard is intentionally lowered to achieve another goal, such as speed or cost. For example, "They might "compromise on quality for" a faster release date."

What does it mean to "sacrifice quality for" something?

It means to intentionally reduce or lower the standard of something (its quality) in order to gain an advantage or achieve another goal. This often involves a trade-off between excellence and another factor, like efficiency or affordability.

Which is a better choice, "compromise quality for" or "sacrifice quality for"?

Both phrases are suitable, the best one depends on the context. "Sacrifice quality for" suggests a more significant reduction in standards. "Compromise quality for" may imply a milder reduction or a negotiated agreement.

What are some alternatives to "sacrifice quality for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "trade quality for", "lower standards for", or "reduce quality for", which all convey a similar meaning of reducing quality to achieve another benefit.