Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(50)
Rock mass rating (RMR), Rock mass quality (Q) and Geological strength index (GSI) systems were used for empirical rock mass quality determination, site characterization and support design.
Based on the parameters observed in the field and point load test, the ratings were assigned according to the rock mass rating [10].
Then, the value of MRMR (Mining Rock Mass Rating) was determined for each zone.
In the present work, a generic rock mass rating (GRMR) system is developed.
The rock mass rating (RMR) and rock mass quality (Q) systems were employed for empirical rock mass quality determination.
Rock masses were characterized in terms of rock mass rating (RMR), geological strength index (GSI) and Q System.
Similar(10)
There are four classification systems: rock-quality designation (RQD), rock-mass rating (RMR), the rock-mass quality (Q) system, and geological strength index (GSI).
Using these measurements slope stability probability classifications (SSPC) have been quantified based on an adaptation of Hack's [Slope Stability Probability Classification, ITC Delft Publication, Enschede, Netherlands, vol. 43, 1998, 273 pp.] SSPC system, which places less influence on rock quality designation and unconfined compressive strength than previous slope/rock mass rating systems.
In 2007 an alternative classification scheme based on the RMR, the Hierarchical Rock Mass Rating (HRMR) was presented.
In this paper, two geostatistical approaches are compared for modeling the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), which is used to geomechanically characterize the rock mass in geotechnical works.
For that reason, many models have been proposed to estimate the deformation moduli of rock masses based on geotechnical classification indices, such as the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), the Geological Strength Index (GSI), the Tunneling Quality Index (Q), or the Rock Quality Designation (RQD).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com