Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Reviewed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been examined or assessed, often in the context of documents, reports, or feedback. Example: "The report has been reviewed by the committee and is ready for approval."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

There were no further feedback from the e-mail system or website.

You then submit your translation and receive further feedback from your peer group.

News & Media

The Guardian

The guidelines are validated through further feedback from industry.

Other than broadening one of the checklist items i.e. from reviewing antibiotics to reviewing all medications, no further additions to the checklist items were suggested.

"The [punishment] range extends from… no further action to the other end of the spectrum, potential court-martial," McHugh said.

News & Media

Vice

Further feedback was received by end-users 2 weeks and also 2 months post-initial implementation.

No further word from Evan.

News & Media

The New Yorker

There was no further correspondence from Worcester.

News & Media

The New Yorker

There was no further comment from Torbay Hospital.

News & Media

BBC

There was no further response from Grisham.

News & Media

Huffington Post

No further instruction or feedback was provided for the practice or pretest trials.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "Reviewed" when you want to indicate that something has been examined or assessed. It's particularly useful in contexts where a document, report, or feedback has undergone a formal review process.

Common error

Avoid using "Reviewed" in very casual or informal situations where simpler words like "checked" or "looked at" would be more appropriate. Overusing formal language can make your writing sound stilted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "Reviewed" is as a past participle, often used in passive voice constructions to indicate that something has undergone a process of examination or assessment. Ludwig confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "Reviewed" functions as a past participle indicating that something has been examined and assessed. According to Ludwig, it's grammatically correct and appropriate for neutral to formal contexts, especially in academic, professional, and news settings. While the phrase is accurate, it's relatively rare, so consider context-appropriate synonyms like "examined" or "assessed" to avoid overuse. To be more specific, use simpler alternatives like "checked" or "looked at" in informal contexts. While "reviewed" is a valid part of the English language, there are many ways to improve and diversify your writing when using alternatives.

FAQs

How can I use "Reviewed" in a sentence?

You can use "Reviewed" to indicate that something has been examined, for example: "The document was "reviewed" by the committee before approval."

What's a simple synonym for "Reviewed"?

Depending on the context, you can replace "Reviewed" with simpler alternatives such as "checked", "examined", or "assessed".

Is it always necessary to specify who "Reviewed" something?

No, but specifying who did the "review" can add credibility or provide context. For instance, "The study was "peer-reviewed" by experts in the field" is more informative.

What is the difference between "Reviewed" and "Revised"?

"Reviewed" means to examine or assess something, while "revised" means to make changes or corrections to something. You "review" a document to see if it needs to be revised.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: