Sentence examples for Reasons for concluding from inspiring English sources
Companies can have many reasons for concluding that patents are useless to them but potentially valuable to others.
In a concurring opinion, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, along with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Justice William H. Rehnquist, gave somewhat different reasons for concluding Dr. Diamond lacked standing.
Thus the statement said that banks should document their reasons for concluding that each complex instrument developed and sold would be used for a legitimate purpose and not to evade the law.
Judge Kaplan said there were "persuasive reasons" for concluding that the funds "beneficially owned at least some and quite possibly all" of the shares bought by the brokerage firms to hedge their swap positions.
Believing as I do that we should reach and decide these claims, I shall state briefly my reasons for concluding that they are not sufficiently substantial to warrant setting the case for argument, and that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.
There is a range of reasons for concluding that it cannot.
That was the reason for concluding that.
According to Dugin, a key reason for concluding a Grand Alliance with Iran is Russia's need for a Muslim ally in its struggle against secular Turkey and "Islamic Saudi Arabia" with its dangerous Wahhabism.
Nor do we have reason for concluding that the device California chose, § 6830(d) (Supp.1974), was not an essential part of its overall mechanism to achieve its acceptable goals.
The Court of Appeals reasonably concluded in Wilbur that the fact that Congress had in 1920 changed the procedurefrom 'location' to 'leasing'for acquisition of oil and gas rights afforded no reason for concluding that they had thereby intended to cut back the power granted in 1910.
17 Just as the difference in wording between the two jurisdictional provisions is, in light of the historical evidence, not a persuasive reason for concluding that they differ in meaning, the variation between §§ 629(16) and 1979 does not justify a construction that gives the latter a vastly broader scope than its jurisdictional counterpart.
