Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The following crop (wheat) recovered 2.1%2.8%% of the residual N from N applied to the previous wheat crop with recovery generally decreasing in the subsequent three crops (beans, maize and wheat).
Comparison of NimbleGen mapping data with the previous wheat EST deletion bin map.
(ii) We also compared our NimbleGen deletion bin mapping result with the previous wheat EST deletion bin map [ 27 ].
When mapping probes to specific deletion bins, 60%% of NimbleGen data agreed with the previous wheat EST deletion bin map.
It is important to notice that 13 families (58 miRNAs) have not yet been reported in previous wheat miRNA identification studies recorded in miRBase.
Furthermore, many factors that affect miRNA expression including genotypes, tissues, age, development stage, growth condition (soil, hydroponic solution, temperature, humidity and photoperiod), stress treatment, are rarely considered in previous wheat miRNA identification studies.
Similar(53)
As shown in previous studies, wheat chromosome 3 is largely collinear to rice Os1 [ 29, 38] and to B. distachyon Bd2 [ 39].
In central Iran, the straw of previous crop (irrigated wheat) is baled and removed and the stubble is burnt in situ because of the difficulties of plowing in the presence of high volumes of stubble.
Previous work shows wheat straw ethanol yields varying from 31%to84%4% of theoretical maximum value, depending on the pretreatment method applied, enzyme loading during hydrolysis [ 8] and yeast culture used [ 9- 12], as well as cultivar and local growing conditions which affect the composition of the biomass.
Moreover, previous study on wheat miRNAs prediction relied on extremely limited wheat genome sequences, and given the larger genome size of wheat, there may be additional miRNAs that have not been identified.
The results obtained are consistent with previous findings in wheat and suggest that Ggpps1, Zds and Hyd3 on chromosome 2Hch may be considered candidate genes in wheat for further studies in YPC improvement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com