Points for discussion

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Points for discussion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to introduce topics or issues that are intended to be discussed in a meeting or conversation. Example: "During the meeting, we will cover several points for discussion, including budget allocation and project timelines."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

Points for discussion will include: How can business work best with governments?

The Guardian

Points for discussion will include: The rise of patient powered healthcare (through wearables, new self-testing kits etc).

The Guardian

This reading guide contains starting points for discussion.

The Guardian

This uses a simple narrative about a broom – with lots of points for discussion and engagement.

The Guardian

The views do not presume to show architectural details, and officials emphasized that the first six concepts are not blueprints but merely starting points for discussion.

The New York Times

These were no more than points for discussion and may not appear in this form when the draft guidelines are published.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

Many of the discussions from this group of teachers are used as starting points for discussions with students.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Some of these themes were trigger points for discussions in the IDIs with some of the participants.

BMC Public Health

Use their responses as a starting point for discussion or have the students discuss their responses in small groups.

University of California, Berkeley

How she answered became a point for discussion.

The Washington Post

It gives us a starting point for discussion.

The New York Times - Food

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "Points for discussion" to clearly signal the beginning of a focused conversation or section within a document. This helps structure the flow of ideas and keeps participants on track.

Common error

While "Points for discussion" is perfectly acceptable, avoid using it excessively in casual conversations. Opt for more natural alternatives like "things to talk about" or "what we should discuss" to maintain a conversational tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Points for discussion" functions primarily as a noun phrase that introduces a list or set of topics intended for conversation or debate. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and grammatically sound way to structure an agenda or outline.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Academia

13%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "Points for discussion" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to introduce topics for consideration in various settings. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity and usefulness. While versatile, it's best suited for neutral to professional contexts, such as meetings, presentations, or formal writing. Alternatives like "topics for discussion" or "talking points" can be used depending on the situation. Remember to use it judiciously in informal settings to maintain a natural conversational tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Topics for discussion

Replaces "points" with "topics", a direct synonym, slightly altering the focus but maintaining the core meaning.

Talking points

Uses a more concise, idiomatic expression common in political or business contexts.

Agenda items

More formal, typically used in meeting contexts to refer to specific issues to be addressed.

Matters for consideration

A more formal and detailed alternative, suitable for official documentation.

Subjects for deliberation

Emphasizes thoughtful consideration and debate, appropriate for serious discussions.

Issues to address

Highlights problems or challenges that need to be resolved through discussion.

Areas for dialogue

Focuses on the interactive exchange of ideas and opinions.

Questions to explore

Frames the discussion as an investigation or inquiry into specific topics.

Themes to consider

Highlights broader overarching concepts that need to be taken into account.

Key considerations

Emphasizes the most important factors to keep in mind during a discussion.

FAQs

How can I use "Points for discussion" in a sentence?

You can use "Points for discussion" to introduce a list of topics that will be covered in a meeting or conversation. For example, "The "points for discussion" include budget allocation, project timelines, and resource management."

What can I say instead of "Points for discussion"?

Alternatives to "Points for discussion" include "topics for discussion", "talking points", or "agenda items", depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "Points for discussion" in an informal setting?

While grammatically correct, "Points for discussion" might sound overly formal in casual conversations. In informal settings, consider using phrases like "things to talk about" or "what we should discuss" instead.

What's the difference between "Points for discussion" and "Key considerations"?

"Points for discussion" introduces specific topics intended for conversation. "Key considerations", on the other hand, emphasizes the most important factors to keep in mind during a decision-making process or analysis. The former is about starting a conversation, while the latter is about focusing on essential elements.