Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Participant feedback revealed a positive attitude toward annotations.
Participant feedback has shown low initial awareness of practice guidelines but high satisfaction with their use.
Participant feedback was subjected to thematic analysis to understand the patient experience of receiving the intervention.
Participant feedback could not be ascertained in the SMR due to its secondary nature.
Participant feedback and observations were collated to direct future departmental training.
Participant feedback indicates players are split between wanting to run their own business and leaving it to the pros.
Participant feedback across all courses was positive with 98% agreeing that the course was relevant to their practice & 96% agreeing that the course was worthwhile.
Participant feedback from the workshops was positive.
Participant feedback about the module was positive.
Participant feedback regarding the HF ER-ICM program was favourable.
Participant feedback about the use of literature excerpts during the module was on the whole positive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com