Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
DMSP 15 crosses this airglow patch at ~5.8 MLT, which is slightly out of our criterion for MLT of conjunction (6 18 MLT), and thus, this airglow patch is not included in our conjunction database, even though it evolved similarly to the first PMAF and patch, and was later measured by DMSP adjacent to the first airglow patch.
This is of special importance since our conjunction results did not survive a corrected threshold.
Significant activation clusters were identified by our conjunction analysis described earlier.
Both the contrast of PR versus rest and our conjunction analyses found bilateral PFC activity during the KPT.
Therefore, our conjunction analyses of bilateral dlPFC may reflect more of the working memory and updating processing rather than that specific to language phonological processing.
This study thus suggests that the absence of FEF activity in our conjunction analysis makes it unlikely that participants planned more saccades when more dots were presented.
Similar(52)
Compared to other studies collecting categorization accuracy in conjunction with correct recognition of old partners (Barclay, personal communication; [20], [22]), our conjunction-categorization rates exceed the rates of these studies by 8 68% (Table S1).
Compared to other studies collecting categorization accuracy in conjunction with correct recognition of old partners, our conjunction-categorization rates from the second session after 1 week exceed the rates from studies with retention interval of several minutes by 10 47% (Table S1).
We also assess whether task difficulty could account for our conjunction-task findings, presented in the final results section.
Our conjunction-task WM model thus reflects a frontoparietal network that is not domain-specific to ventral or dorsal pathways.
First, our conjunction-task cost does not present as a marked drop in conjunction versus single performance as would be expected by a fully serial processing account: conjunction performance accuracy is only 9.3%and8.2%2% lower than color and angle accuracy, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com