Notes were included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Notes were included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that additional information or comments have been provided alongside a document or message. Example: "In the report, notes were included to clarify the data presented in the charts."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Those notes were included in data analysis.

BMC Health Services Research

The field notes were included in the data collection.

BMC Geriatrics

In the present study data from video observations and field notes were included.

BMC Pediatrics

Case notes were included in the qualitative data analysis described below.

BMJ Open

For the re-audit, 20 case notes were included from each clinic that participated in the original audit.

BMC Psychiatry

We compared mortality among acute medical patients whose notes were included in the explicit review from before and after the intervention.

British Medical Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Extensive implementation notes are included.

Columbia University

Explanatory notes are included to explain the material more fully.

Harvard University

(Those notes are included in the book, and Baraka organized the concert that he annotated there).

The New Yorker

A copy of the notes was included with the jury report.

The New York Times - Sports

An average of 27 seconds to leave any explanatory notes is included within the 310 second target.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "notes were included", ensure that the context clearly indicates what the notes pertain to and why they are relevant to the main subject. This helps maintain clarity and prevents ambiguity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "notes were included" without specifying where the notes can be found or what their purpose is. For example, instead of saying "Notes were included", specify "Additional notes on data limitations were included in Appendix A".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "notes were included" functions as a passive construction indicating that supplementary information, explanations, or comments have been added to a primary document or data. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "notes were included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate the presence of supplementary information within a document or data set. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it commonly appears in scientific, academic, and news-related contexts, emphasizing the importance of clarity and additional context. Alternatives such as "notes were appended" or "notes were added" offer slight variations in meaning but maintain the core idea. When using this phrase, ensure that the reference to the notes is clear and specific to avoid any ambiguity for the reader.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

notes were appended

Replaces 'included' with 'appended', suggesting the notes were added at the end.

notes were added

Simplifies the phrase by using 'added' instead of 'included'.

notes were attached

Suggests that the notes were physically or digitally connected to something.

notes are present

Focuses on the presence of the notes rather than the action of including them.

notes are provided

Emphasizes that the notes are being supplied for information.

notes have been incorporated

More formal, implying a thorough integration of the notes.

details were included

Substitutes 'details' for 'notes', widening the scope of what's added.

annotations were included

Replaces 'notes' with 'annotations', which implies more explanatory content.

information was added

Uses 'information' for general cases, instead of specific 'notes'.

additional information was provided

Expands on the idea, emphasizing the provision of extra information.

FAQs

How can I use "notes were included" in a sentence?

You can use "notes were included" to indicate that additional information, explanations, or comments were added to a document or a piece of writing. For example, "In the research report, "notes were included" to clarify the methodology used".

What are some alternatives to "notes were included"?

Alternatives to "notes were included" include "notes were appended", "notes were added", or "additional information was provided" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying "notes were included"?

The passive voice construction "notes were included" is appropriate when the focus is on the notes themselves rather than who included them. If you want to emphasize the person or group that added the notes, you could use the active voice: "The author included notes".

What is the difference between "notes were included" and "annotations were included"?

"Notes were included" generally implies that additional information or comments were added. "Annotations were included", on the other hand, suggests that the additional information provides explanations, critiques, or elaborations on the original text or data.