Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Next, scores for treatment attribute categories most preferred by the participants (attribute categories with the highest preferences score) and attribute categories least preferred by the participants (attribute categories with lowest preference scores) were summed.
We also find that the highest preference is observed for Cys-Cys contact, and the lowest preference is Gln-His contact.
In contrast, animals with the lowest Preference scores included wild boar, rat, and bat.
The assignment of the lowest Preference and Coexistence scores to wild boar was probably due to religion.
The effect size of this attribute was rated by the participants as approximately six times as important as the attribute with the lowest preference.
Indeed, it is the most promiscuous non-visual arrestin with the lowest preference for phosphorylated over unphosphorylated receptor (Celver et al., 2002; Zhan et al., 2011), the lowest receptor subtype selectivity (Barak et al., 1997; Zhan et al., 2011), and higher affinity for many non-receptor partners (Goodman et al., 1996; Ahmed et al., 2011).
Similar(50)
Dealing first with Model 2, which was ranked highest in terms of both preference and acceptability by the largest proportion of people, three quarters (n = 6 of 8) of those who gave this model a low preference score (i.e third preference or least preferred in the afternoon session) said that they would be willing to accept it.
Model 1 was the least preferred model, with the majority of respondents ranking it as a low preference (third or least).
For the chart below I've converted that to a numeric scale, ranging from 0 (low preference) to 2 (high).
An effect of scenic quality on variability was also found with results showing higher consensus for the high preference landscapes than for the low preference landscapes.
The pygmy field mouse preferred (100%) the seed head of wheat, also the wood mouse (87%) and common vole (60%) showed low preference for wheat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com