Less share

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Less share" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a smaller amount of sharing or a reduced share, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "We need to focus on less share of the market to maintain our competitive edge."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

"We all more or less share his position.

The Guardian - Arts

In fact, India shares interests with its regional neighbours, and they, more or less, share interests with it.

The Economist

"Foreign buyers should more or less share our costs, including the high cost of reducing environmental pollution".

The New York Times

But the case for a coordinated fiscal-monetary push seems overwhelming given the intellectual framework all of us, I think, more or less share.

The New York Times

But the President-elect doesn't even want to be in the same room with that low-life -- much less share the West Wing.

The New York Times

Boris Johnson would not be caught dead in a photograph with Mr Paul, much less share his ideology.Abe Silberstein New YorkSIR – When I was 17 I stood in a mock election at the state grammar school I attended.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Fans more or less shared his opinion.

The Guardian - Sport

What's so great about the life less shared?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The effect is less comment on shared comment, but there is also less sharing of news stories.

The Guardian - Tech

The poorest 110 million Americans had less, sharing 14.4percentt of all after tax money.

The New York Times

However, across the divide between rich and poor countries, there is much less sharing.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing market share or ownership, use precise language like "smaller market share" or "reduced stake" for clarity.

Common error

Don't use the vague phrase "less share." Instead, specify what is being shared and the extent of the reduction using phrases such as "smaller portion" or "reduced involvement" for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less share" functions as a noun phrase that attempts to indicate a smaller portion or stake. However, it lacks grammatical precision and is often perceived as incorrect. As Ludwig AI also reports, its intended meaning is not clearly conveyed.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "less share" appears across various sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI highlights that it does not convey a clear meaning. Therefore, opting for alternatives like "smaller portion", "reduced involvement", or "diminished stake" is advisable for improved precision and professionalism. The context in which you intend to use the phrase will dictate the best alternative, ensuring your message is accurately communicated. Remember to avoid ambiguity by specifying what is being shared and the extent of the reduction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Smaller portion

Emphasizes a reduced quantity or amount of something.

Smaller stake

Emphasizes a reduced claim or interest.

Reduced involvement

Focuses on decreased participation or engagement.

Decreased ownership

Highlights a reduced level of possession or control.

Diminished stake

Highlights a lesser claim or interest in something.

Limited equity

Focuses on a restricted financial interest.

Lower percentage

Quantifies the reduction in terms of a numerical value.

Cutback in equity

Focuses on a reduction in the financial interest.

Scaled-down participation

Highlights the reduced level of involvement.

Lesser contribution

Highlights a smaller input or donation.

FAQs

How can I use the concept of a reduced portion in a sentence?

Instead of "less share", try using alternatives like "smaller portion", "reduced involvement", or "diminished stake" to convey the meaning more effectively.

What is a more grammatically sound way to express having a smaller part of something?

Opt for phrases such as "smaller stake", "decreased ownership", or "limited equity" instead of "less share."

Which phrase is more accurate: "less share" or "smaller portion"?

"Smaller portion" is more accurate and grammatically correct. "Less share" is vague and does not clearly indicate what is being reduced.

When is it appropriate to use "less contribution" as an alternative to "less share"?

Use "less contribution" when referring to a smaller input or donation, such as in a project or charitable cause. It's a more specific and appropriate alternative in such contexts.