As a consequence, NIRS based brain-computer-interfaces (BCIs) and neurofeedback learning systems, may have a latency of several seconds in responding to a change in participants' behavioral or mental states, severely limiting the practical use of such systems.
Our primary (null) hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference between the new system and conventional methods in the rate of errors in the recording and administration of medications or in the number of lapses in responding to a vigilance latency test.
To determine whether the latency of responding to a visually paired stimulus also decreases with fear conditioning we assessed cumulative frequency distributions in the latency to fire across days.
Latency to respond to the heat stimulus by vigorous flexion of the tail was measured.
There was a significant increase in the latency to respond to the ambiguous probe following day 8, with no significant increase experienced for either the positive or less-positive probes.
The worse performance of STI1−/+ mice was not related to changes in motivation (latency to respond to the stimulus, RM-ANOVA, no effect of genotype F 1,25)=0.01856, P=0.8925, no effect of stimulus duration F 3,75)=1.720, P=0.1702, no interaction F 3,75)=1.070, P=0.3669).
These larvae also display a deficit in thermosensation, showing a latency to respond to rising temperature consistent with a lack of function in the class IV md neurons.
No significant differences between the genotypes were observed for the latency to respond to the stimulus in the 129SVE and FVB strains.
The mean latency to respond to the visual cue in this final session was 2.28 s and less than 2% of the cue presentations reached the maximum 30 s duration; there were no genotype or background differences on either measure.
We measured a male's strength of response by his latency to respond to the call and the duration of time spent looking in the direction of the speaker.
For example, latency to respond to the hot plate test, a measure of nociception [35], was slower in strains that carried the duplication (r = 0.81; p<0.81).
