Sentence examples for Iterative voting from inspiring English sources

The consensus meeting in the ICF process is a residential event with time allocated to training, and iterative voting to rank aspects of health.

The key concepts in delineating nuclei have been watershed (Chawla et al., 2004) with user intervention, active surface models (Padfield et al., 2009), gradient flow tracking (GFT) (Li et al., 2007), atlas-based methods (Qu et al., 2011) and hybrid methods of seed detection through iterative voting (IV) and geometric partitioning (Han et al., 2011).

22, 23 It uses a process of anonymous and iterative feedback and voting to achieve consensus among a panel of independent experts by means of stepwise refinement of responses.

Participants: In order to allow multiprofessional collaboration and to represent different stakeholder groups, the complete consensus process with structured iterative discussion and consensus voting will consist of 25 experts with methodological, clinical, medical, functional and psychological expertise as well as patient representatives.

All the projects were interesting – I haven't mentioned the alternative to money proposed by Traeder, or the mobile voting platform made by Iterative, both of whom won prizes – and the selection above is simply picked to provide a cross-section.

Since these assumptions can be statistically false, Iterative White Balancing (IWB) [11] iteratively refines the white pixels while illuminant voting [12] checks the lighting conditions.

This algorithm achieves the goal of segmentation via design of an iterative approach that extracts the structure through voting of feature vectors formed by distance, local intensity gradient, and median measures.

The task force thus voted for and applied an iterative robust estimation scheme in space.

During the consensus conference, all the participants were introduced to the ICF framework, classification structure and codes, and then the ICF categories relevant for patients with IBD were identified in an iterative decision-making process that included discussions and voting in working groups and plenary sessions.

The final document was developed through an iterative series of comments and questionnaires with a majority vote required to place an element in a specific category.

This method is an iterative process that uses a systematic progression of repeated rounds of voting and is an effective process for determining expert group consensus where there is little or no definitive evidence and where opinion is important.