It can be understood, too, but only dimly and in flashes.
It can be understood as an instruction in the limitations of and deluded aspirations for power.
It can be understood as a four-stage process: problem specification, looking for potential solutions, piloting those solutions, and scaling them where appropriate.
It can be understood in terms of the development of an evolving monsoon/desert system.
It can be understood as applying a Popperian view to proof-theoretic semantics.
It can be understood as the dissolution or the rupture of the filament in terms of RRAM devices.
It can be understood as that each edge of the network carries an equation of source symbols.
It can be understood as a layer of abstraction between abstract algorithm code and actual data-distribution logic.
It can be understood alternatively as an expression of the human perspective on the world, which, as an embodied individual, we typically cannot avoid.
It can be understood as an interpretation of a threshold notion of harm in different number choices (see also Reiman 2007; Attas 2009).
It can be understood by all the people of the Earth.
