Indicted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Indicted for" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to someone who has been formally charged with a crime. Example: "The politician was indicted for corruption." Alternative expressions include "charged with" and "accused of."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Scaffa later indicted for compounding a felony.

The New Yorker

They are almost never indicted for it.

The Economist

The brothers were indicted for grand theft.

The New Yorker

Cohen was freed & Sorro indicted for perjury.

The New Yorker

He has not been indicted for anything.

The New York Times

"My dentist was recently indicted for murder".

The New Yorker

"Unlike Rupert Murdoch, I'm not being indicted for anything".

The New York Times

Mr Jefferson was indicted for bribery on June 4th.

The Economist

He was never indicted for lying to federal agents.

The New Yorker

Casey, the ex-cop, was indicted for murder.

The New Yorker

He was thus indicted for treason by the U.S. government.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always follow the verb with the specific crime or action, such as 'murder', 'fraud' or 'conspiracy'.

Common error

A common mistake is using 'indicted with' instead of "Indicted for". While 'charged with' is correct, the verb 'indict' requires the preposition 'for' to specify the crime.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Indicted for" functions as a passive verb construction combined with a preposition. It is used to describe the formal legal status of a subject who has been officially accused of a crime by a grand jury. In Ludwig AI, this structure is frequently observed as 'Subject + was/were + indicted + for + Crime'.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Encyclopedias

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "Indicted for" is a highly authoritative and grammatically correct term used to describe a formal grand jury accusation. According to Ludwig AI data, it is a staple of high-quality journalism, appearing frequently in sources like The New York Times and The Economist. It is almost exclusively used in the passive voice to identify the specific crime a person or entity is facing. Writers should be careful to use the preposition 'for' rather than 'with', and understand that it carries a more specific legal weight than simply being "accused of" a crime. Overall, it is the preferred term for formal, objective reporting on criminal proceedings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Charged with

Uses a different preposition and is a broader term for any formal legal accusation, not just grand jury indictments.

Accused of

More general and can refer to informal allegations outside of a court setting.

Arrested on charges of

Focuses on the physical act of arrest accompanying the legal accusation.

Prosecuted for

Describes the entire legal proceeding rather than the specific act of being formally charged.

Arraigned for

Refers to a specific later stage in the legal process where the defendant is called before a court to plead.

Implicated in

Suggests involvement in a crime without necessarily implying a formal charge has been filed yet.

Incriminated for

Suggests evidence has been found to make someone appear guilty, often used before formal charges.

Held for

Focuses on the detention of the individual rather than the specific formal charge.

Booked for

A more informal or police-centric term referring to the administrative recording of an arrest.

Sued for

Used specifically for civil legal actions rather than criminal proceedings.

FAQs

What is the difference between indicted for and charged with?

While both mean a person is formally accused of a crime, "charged with" is a general term, whereas "Indicted for" specifically implies that a grand jury has determined there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.

Is it correct to say indicted with a crime?

No, you should use "Indicted for" followed by the crime. If you want to use the preposition 'with', you should use the phrase "charged with" instead.

What can I say instead of indicted for?

Depending on the context, you can use "accused of" for general allegations, or "prosecuted for" if the legal proceedings have already begun.

When should I use indicted for in a sentence?

You should use it when reporting on formal legal developments. For example: 'The executive was "Indicted for" "insider trading" after a lengthy investigation'.