There is something sensible in all these propositions.
In making these propositions, there is a reconnection of the garden of pleasure with environmental good, achieving a 'scientific sublimation' (Conan 2005) and, by exploiting the mutability of taste, a neo-baroque ecology allows for ecological restoration in an expanded field.
But in practice, these propositions are simply too abstract and difficult to enforce.
African wars are, above all, matters for fellow Africans.Caution versus credibilityThere is merit in each of these propositions, though some of them are contradictory.
If, in respect of these propositions, no error was committed, the judgment should be affirmed without any reference to points of a minor and merely technical nature, which do not involve the merits of the case, or the just rights of the parties.
Next time, in my third and final entry on fiscal austerity, I'll cite some of the evidence in favor of these propositions; I'll also summarize findings from careful studies of historical cases of austerity, where the economy (and fiscal balances) either worsened because austerity meant more taxes on the economy, or improved because austerity meant real restraint in government spending.
In her remarkable campaign video, she states these propositions in a calm, rational matter-of-fact fashion, not at all like a crazy radical firebrand.
The focus of this entry is intuitions mental states or events in which a proposition seems true in the manner of these propositions.
We already accept all of these propositions in many other contexts.
