Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
seemed only selectively interested in the data.
"It didn't work in the data.
"But it was there in the data".
But the difference is in the data.
There is a gap in the data.
What patterns are in the data?
Some economists saw distortions in the data.
That produces artificial cooling in the data.
They're not included in the data.
She simply saw a puzzling, inviting gap in the data.
But there were bright spots in the data released yesterday.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com