Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
In Hobby Lobby, owners of a crafts store sought, and received, by a 5-4 vote, an exemption from the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
In Hobby Lobby, it was corporate owners who felt "implicated" by the contraceptive decisions of the employees whose health insurance they helped pay for.
In Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, he ruled that a multibillion-dollar corporation could withhold federally guaranteed rights to birth control from thousands of female employees because of the religious beliefs of the corporation's owners.
In Hobby Lobby, a narrow five-to-four majoritheof the Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 gave the proprietors of a chain of retail craft stores the right to exempt themselves from certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
In Hobby Lobby, however, the Court's five conservative Justices don't appear to have gotten the memo.
In Hobby Lobby, the Court reasoned that if the federal government can provide this accommodation for not-for-profit employers, it can do the same for for-profit religiously-affiliated employers (such as Hobby Lobby).
The term now heard in hobby stores is "ARTF".
That is something the majority decision in Hobby Lobby leaves shockingly undefined.
But as the government's brief in Hobby Lobby makes clear, it too wants the issue resolved.
Such is the case with Justice Alito's singularly immodest opinion in Hobby Lobby.
The exchange between the two Justices gets to the heart of the issue in Hobby Lobby.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com