Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(58)
In criterion validation we are supposed to use the gold standard test or as in our case, a similar instrument.
In criterion validity studies, the ZBI has shown a high correlation with similar instruments (r = 0.71 with overall burden rate, r = 0.41 with Brief Symptom Inventory) were also closely related to detection of other disorders, mainly in mental health.
Moreover, it is apparent that more transmit power is placed between the subcarrier 80 and 128 in Criteria 2 and 3 than that in Criterion 1.
Each of the aforementioned titles looks and sounds as close to perfect as they ever will, and each comes with a wealth of bonus features (or "supplements" in Criterion lingo).
Correction: May 20, 2000, Saturday A report in the Company News column of Business Day yesterday about the sale of a stake in Criterion Catalyst, which is a joint venture of Cytec Industries and CRI International Inc., misidentified the company that is assuming $40 million of Criterion's debt.
A specialty chemicals company, Cytec Industries, agreed yesterday to sell its 50percentt stake in Criterion Catalyst, a petrochemical refining company, for $60 million to its joint venture partner CRI International Inc. Cytec will also assume $40 million of Criterion's debt, half of the venture's debt.
A high quality Futures Map in criterion 6 and especially in criterion 5 avoids the information overflow.
All the studies mentioned above reported significant improvement in Criterion® holistic and other writing quality scores.
The indicator performs better than or as well as other available indicators in criterion validity tests.
Similar(2)
The collection of trees produced at this point was pruned heuristically by viewing the output of likelihood scores in MrBayes, and only trees near the optimum likelihood score were retained using the appropriate burn-in criterion.
Values larger (smaller) than the rule-in criterion provoke inclusion by commitment (exclusion by deferral).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com