I was submitted to

USAGE SUMMARY

"I was submitted to" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, you could say "I was submitted to my supervisor for review."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The second day I was submitted to a mock interview that was recorded on video and evaluated professionally afterwards.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Only 25 of the 29 cases of CR-BSI were submitted to PFGE since E. coli and yeasts were not analyzed by this technique.

BMC Infectious Diseases

I mean, it's submitted to us ahead of time.

Cornell University

That's exactly what the budget I'm submitting to Congress has begun to achieve.

The New York Times

Instead, he continued, "I am submitting to my colleagues the strongest open Internet protections ever proposed by the FCC".

The New Yorker

In an op-ed for Wired, FCC Director Tom Wheeler said: "I am submitting to my colleagues the strongest open Internet protections ever proposed by the FCC.

Independent

Oh those are scripts I'm submitting to HBO.

Huffington Post

"Using this authority, I am submitting to my colleagues the strongest open Internet protections ever proposed by the FCC," he wrote.

Huffington Post

The complete sequence of E2 was submitted to the I-Tasser server.

F1000Research

Furthermore, 8 patients in stage I have been submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy (Vinblastine 0.2 0.3 mg/Kg i.v ., 1 patient in stage II, 6 in stage III and nobody in stage IV.

BMC Cancer

All sequences identified as Kunitz/BPTI proteins were submitted to the SignalP 4.0 server [ 30] for signal peptide prediction.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I was submitted to", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what initiated the submission. Clarity is key in passive voice constructions.

Common error

Avoid using "I was submitted to" when you want to emphasize your own action or decision. This phrase implies a lack of control, so choose active voice when appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was submitted to" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the speaker was the recipient of an action, specifically, being presented or referred to something or someone. As Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase follows standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I was submitted to" is a grammatically sound passive construction used to describe the experience of being presented or referred for something, often for evaluation or review. As Ludwig AI confirms, it follows standard English grammar. While not extremely common, it appears in a variety of formal contexts, including science, news, academia and business settings. The related phrases such as "I underwent" and "I was subjected to" can offer alternative ways to express similar ideas, each with subtle differences in emphasis. When using this phrase, clarity about the agent performing the submission is crucial to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I was subjected to

Highlights the experience of being exposed to something, often implying a negative experience.

I was exposed to

Highlights the state of being open to something, shifting the focus away from active submission.

I underwent

Focuses on the experience of going through something, omitting the submission aspect.

I was made to

Emphasizes obligation, modifying agency compared to "I was submitted to".

I was referred for

Highlights being sent for something, changing the agency.

I experienced

Emphasizes the personal experience, not the process of being submitted.

I went through

Focuses on the process of passing through an experience, excluding submission.

I faced

Focuses on encountering or confronting something, excluding the submission.

I participated in

Highlights involvement or activity, changing the passive tone.

I received

Focuses on obtaining something, excluding the submission element.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "I was submitted to" to sound more active?

Consider using alternatives like "I underwent", "I experienced", or "I faced" depending on the specific context and what you want to emphasize. Each option shifts the focus from passive reception to a more direct experience.

What does "I was submitted to" imply about my role in a situation?

It suggests a passive role where you were subjected to a process, review, or authority. This contrasts with a more active phrasing where you initiated or controlled the action.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "I was submitted to"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize that you were subject to a process or authority without necessarily focusing on your own actions. This could include performance reviews, applications, or other situations where you are being assessed.

Is "I was subjected to" the same as "I was submitted to"?

While similar, "I was subjected to" often implies a negative or unpleasant experience. "I was submitted to" is more neutral and simply indicates a process of being presented or referred for something. Consider your intended connotation when choosing between the two.