Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

I was shocking

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The sentence 'I was shocking' is not correct in written English.
'Shocking' is an adjective, so it cannot be used to describe a person. You may use it to describe something that the person experienced or encountered, such as 'I was shocked by the news.'.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"I was shocking again on the greens," he sighed.

News & Media

BBC

"I never thought I was shocking," she says.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

"I was shocked, I was just shocked.

News & Media

Independent

Actually, I was shocked.

News & Media

Independent

Denise: I was shocked!

News & Media

The New York Times

But I was shocked.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I was shocked".

I was shocked again!

Now I was shocked.

Then I was shocked.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I was shocked and hurt".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "shocking" to describe yourself; instead, focus on what surprised you or how you reacted to something shocking. For example, say "I was shocked by..." or "I found it shocking that...".

Common error

The adjective "shocking" describes something that causes surprise or offense. It's grammatically incorrect to use it to describe yourself. Reframe the sentence to focus on the source of the surprise or your reaction to it.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was shocking" is grammatically incorrect. Shocking is an adjective that describes something causing surprise or offense. The correct usage involves expressing that something was shocking or stating that you were shocked by something. Ludwig AI confirms this grammatical issue.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I was shocking" is grammatically incorrect. "Shocking" is an adjective used to describe something that causes surprise or offense, not a state of being. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's better to say "I was shocked" to express your own surprise or to describe something else as shocking. While there is a single example of "I was shocking" in the search results, its incorrectness makes it an uncommon and ill-advised phrase. Alternatives like "I was shocked" or "I found it shocking" are recommended for clearer and more accurate communication.

FAQs

How can I correctly use 'shocking' in a sentence?

Use 'shocking' to describe something that causes surprise or offense, not to describe a person directly. For example, say 'The news was shocking' or 'I was shocked by the news'.

What's a better way to say "I was shocking"?

Instead of "I was shocking", try "I was "I was shocked"" or "I found it shocking". This corrects the grammatical error and expresses your surprise more accurately.

Is it correct to say 'I am shocking'?

No, it's not correct. 'Shocking' is an adjective used to describe something that causes shock. You would say "I am shocked" to describe your feeling or experience of being surprised.

What's the difference between "I am shocked" and "I am shocking"?

"I am shocked" means you experienced surprise or disbelief. "I am shocking" is grammatically incorrect; it would imply you are the cause of surprise or offense, which is not typically how the adjective is used in reference to oneself.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: