I was implicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was implicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing involvement in a situation, often with a negative connotation, such as being involved in wrongdoing or a crime. Example: "During the investigation, I was implicated in the scandal, even though I had no direct involvement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It was outlawed in 2002 after the Austrian Grand Prix when I was implicated between Rubens Barrichello and Michael Schumacher at Ferrari.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

To assess whether maternal IGF-I was implicated in the effects of EE on the fetus, we administered, from E10 until E18, a chronic infusion of anti-IGF-I antibody to EC pregnant rats and an infusion of IGF-I protein to SC pregnant rats.

Plosone

It was said against me that by describing Eliot as an anti-semite I was implicating him in projects of terror and murder.

The Guardian - Books

Type I interferons (IFN-I) are implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

EMBO Molecular Medicine

"If I am implicated, it is all right," Mr. Rana said, speaking to reporters in Hindi.

The New York Times

"I was just someone who shared notes, and now I'm implicated in this," said a senior who faces a cheating allegation.

The New York Times

I'm implicated in what it does and I feel I have a responsibility and a right to a say, albeit just a minuscule one, in what it does".

The New Yorker

Of course, by writing about the Gawker coverage, I'm implicated even as I cluck my tongue, obsessing over someone obsessing over someone else's sexuality; it feels icky and very meta at the same time.

The New York Times

One student involved in the recent scandal — which university officials have called the most widespread episode of academic dishonesty in Harvard's history — seemed genuinely confused about what was wrong: "I was just someone who shared notes, and now I'm implicated in this," the student told The New York Times.

The New York Times

I is implicated in pain sensing.

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Dysfunction of mitochondrial complex I is implicated in many human neurodegenerative diseases.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I was implicated", ensure the context clearly indicates the nature of the implication, as it often carries a negative connotation. Provide sufficient detail to avoid ambiguity or misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "I was implicated" when a more neutral term like "involved" or "associated" would be more accurate. Overusing the phrase can create an unwarranted impression of guilt or wrongdoing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was implicated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject (I) is the recipient of the action (being implicated). It typically suggests involvement in something negative or undesirable. Ludwig shows examples in both news and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I was implicated" is a grammatically correct passive construction commonly used to describe being connected or linked to a situation, often with negative connotations. Ludwig AI confirms that it appears in a range of reputable sources, including news media and scientific publications. While alternatives like "I was involved" exist, "I was implicated" specifically suggests an indirect, and potentially unwelcome, connection. When using this phrase, clarity is key to avoid unintended impressions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I was involved

Indicates participation or engagement, which could be positive, negative, or neutral.

I was entangled

Implies a complex or difficult involvement, often unwanted or problematic.

I was associated

Focuses on a general connection or link, without necessarily implying wrongdoing or negativity.

I was mixed up in

Suggests unintentional or accidental involvement, often with negative consequences.

I was linked

Similar to "associated" and "connected", but can sometimes imply a formal or official link.

I was caught up in

Similar to "mixed up in", but emphasizes being swept along by events or circumstances.

I was connected

Highlights a link or relationship, often suggesting a more indirect or passive role.

I was drawn into

Indicates a gradual or subtle involvement, potentially against one's better judgment.

I was tied to

Suggests a strong or binding connection, potentially restricting freedom or choice.

I was a party to

Implies formal or legal involvement, often in an agreement or arrangement.

FAQs

What does "I was implicated" mean?

The phrase "I was implicated" means that you were shown to be involved in something, often something negative or illegal. It suggests an indirect connection or association rather than direct participation.

What's the difference between "I was implicated" and "I was involved"?

"I was implicated" suggests a negative connotation and indirect involvement, while "I was involved" is more neutral and can refer to direct or indirect participation in something.

What are some alternatives to saying "I was implicated"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "I was associated", "I was connected", "I was linked", or "I was entangled".

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing my involvement?

Whether to use active or passive voice depends on the desired emphasis. "I was implicated" (passive) focuses on the action affecting you, while an active construction like "They implicated me" emphasizes who is making the implication.