I was implemented

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was implemented" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is typically used incorrectly, as "implemented" is usually associated with processes or systems rather than individuals. Example: "The new software was implemented successfully last week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Therefore, the coke particle size of (I) was implemented in our work.

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology

The OSCE I was implemented first in 2005 (n = 6), revised and then implemented with a second class of IFM participants in 2006 (n = 7).

BMC Medical Education

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Throughout these five years I faced numerous moments of great tension but they did not mean that the actions I was implementing lost strength," she says.

The Guardian

Everyone has wrinkles!" I was implementing a business strategy from a book called "How to Master the Art of Selling," whereby you ask your potential clients questions they're bound to say "yes" to.

The New Yorker

Let me give you one personal example of hospital decision-making when I was implementing a patient accounting system at a highly respected Seattle hospital.

TechCrunch

It took a week or so, but when the other departments saw that I was implementing their suggestions and asking for nothing in return, one by one they stopped by and asked me how they could reciprocate.

Forbes

I was implementing this first and foremost with my daughter, and then with the rest of the women around me.

Huffington Post

As someone who worked on the current student loan system in England when it was implemented, I know its strengths.

The Guardian

The web service on EMPRES-i is implemented in Java J2EE, SQL and SOAP.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

That approach has some drawbacks, so I am implementing a regular, predictable profit-sharing plan this year.

The New York Times

I'm implementing the strategies that we are putting into place.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "I was implemented" as it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Instead, opt for phrases like "I was introduced", "I was started", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

Common error

Don't use "implemented" when referring to a person's action or state. "Implement" typically applies to systems, plans, or policies, not individuals. For people, use terms like "introduced" or "started" to avoid grammatical errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was implemented" attempts to express a passive construction, but is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, "implemented" is usually associated with processes or systems, not individuals. Therefore, the function is an attempted passive construction with inappropriate verb usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "I was implemented" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, "implement" is typically used for systems or processes rather than individuals. Although the phrase appears across various contexts—including News & Media, Science, and Academia—it remains an infrequent and questionable usage. For clearer and more accurate communication, consider alternatives such as "I was introduced", "I was started", or rephrase the sentence to better reflect the intended meaning. Avoiding this phrase will improve the clarity and correctness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I was put into effect

Replaces 'implemented' with 'put into effect', focusing on the action of being enacted or enforced. Offers a more common, natural way of expressing the start of a process.

I was enacted

Uses 'enacted' to emphasize the formal process of being put into law or practice. Suggests something was made official or legal.

I was initiated

Focuses on the beginning or start of a process, using 'initiated' instead of 'implemented'. Suitable for situations where emphasis is on the commencement.

I was established

Implies setting up or founding something, where 'established' replaces 'implemented'. More appropriate when starting an institution or system.

I was instituted

Similar to 'enacted', suggesting a formal introduction or establishment of a rule or system, using 'instituted' rather than 'implemented'.

I was started

A simpler and more direct way to say something began. Suitable for less formal contexts and where 'implemented' feels too technical.

I was launched

Emphasizes the start or introduction of something new, like a project or product. Uses 'launched' to convey a sense of introduction to the world.

I was introduced

Focuses on the action of bringing something new into use or knowledge, where 'introduced' replaces 'implemented'. Offers a gentle nuance to the beginning.

I was executed

Uses 'executed' to highlight the carrying out or completion of a plan or order. Implies precision and efficiency in bringing something to fruition.

I was applied

Emphasizes the act of putting something into practical use or operation, using 'applied' instead of 'implemented'. Useful when describing the action of using a method or technique.

FAQs

Why is "I was implemented" considered grammatically incorrect?

The verb "implement" typically refers to putting a plan, system, or policy into effect. Using it with "I" suggests that a person is being treated as a process or system, which is grammatically and conceptually incorrect. Better alternatives include "I was introduced" or "I was started".

What can I say instead of "I was implemented" to sound more natural?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "I was introduced", "I was started", or rephrase to clarify who or what initiated the action. For example, instead of saying "I was implemented", try "The system I designed was "put into effect"".

Is there any situation where "I was implemented" might be acceptable?

While generally incorrect, the phrase might be used in highly technical or abstract contexts where a person is being described as part of a larger system's implementation. However, even in those cases, rephrasing is usually preferable for clarity. Consider alternatives like "I was "integrated"" or "I was "incorporated"".

How does the meaning change when using "I was implemented" versus "I implemented"?

"I implemented" means that you were the one putting something into effect, such as a plan or strategy. "I was implemented" suggests (incorrectly) that you were the thing being put into effect. The active voice "I implemented" is grammatically correct and clear, while the passive "I was implemented" is not.