Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I was highlighted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "I was highlighted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something was emphasized or marked for attention, often in a literal or metaphorical sense. Example: "During the presentation, I was highlighted as the key speaker, which made me feel honored."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
This is the dilemma I was highlighting.
News & Media
The physiological importance of RIG-I is highlighted by ex vivo studies from RIG-I knockout MEFs which show drastically reduced interferon levels in response to NDV, VSV, SeV, and influenza ∆NS1 virus infections (Kato et al. 2005, 2006).
Science
The effects of the adhesive properties and the patch size on the stress intensity factor variation at the crack tip in mode I were highlighted.
"I'm highlighting whatever unity is to be found amid all the conflict and diversity".
News & Media
So I am highlighting two recipes that use a single dough.
News & Media
As in past years, I'm highlighting small organizations because you're less likely to know about them.
News & Media
Notice that what I'm highlighting here aren't "mistakes" as in "saying something I disagree with"; I would not, for example, put claims that our problems are mainly structural in the same category.
News & Media
As a tribute to his life, I am highlighting other businesses that also champion the human spirit.
News & Media
I am highlighting their hypocrisy because it has lethal consequences.
News & Media
I wish that kind of success to the pictures I'm highlighting this month.
News & Media
This is why I'm highlighting Congressman Himes: Because he knows exactly what he's doing.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "I was highlighted" when you want to emphasize that you were specifically selected or focused upon in a particular situation. Ensure the context makes it clear why you were highlighted.
Common error
Avoid using "I was highlighted" when you actually mean "I highlighted something". The passive construction focuses on you as the recipient of the action, not the actor.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I was highlighted" functions as a passive construction where the subject ("I") receives the action of being emphasized or made prominent. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
5%
Wiki
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "I was highlighted" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction to express that the speaker received emphasis or special attention. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a correct expression. It's frequently found in news and media, as well as scientific contexts. Related phrases include "I was spotlighted" and "I was emphasized". When using this phrase, ensure that the passive voice aligns with your intended emphasis, focusing on the speaker as the recipient of the action.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I was spotlighted
Replaces "highlighted" with "spotlighted", suggesting a more focused and intense form of attention.
I was emphasized
Uses "emphasized" instead of "highlighted", indicating a focus on importance rather than visual marking.
I was underscored
Substitutes "highlighted" with "underscored", implying that something was given additional weight or significance.
I received prominence
Rephrases the sentence to indicate that the speaker was given importance or distinction.
Attention was drawn to me
Changes the structure to focus on the act of drawing attention to the speaker.
I was brought to the fore
Uses "brought to the fore" to convey that the speaker was given a prominent position.
I stood out
Replaces the passive construction with an active one, indicating that the speaker distinguished themselves.
I was distinguished
Uses "distinguished" instead of "highlighted", indicating being recognized for unique qualities.
I was featured
Replaces "highlighted" with "featured", suggesting a presentation or showcase.
I was singled out
Uses "singled out" to indicate being chosen from a group for special attention.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "I was highlighted" to sound more active?
Consider using phrases like "I stood out" or "I distinguished myself" depending on the context. These options place you as the subject performing the action.
What does "I was highlighted" mean in a professional context?
In a professional setting, "I was highlighted" typically means that your contributions, skills, or achievements were specifically recognized and emphasized by others.
Is "I was highlighted" appropriate for formal writing?
Yes, "I was highlighted" is appropriate for formal writing. However, ensure that the passive voice is the most effective way to convey your message. Sometimes, an active construction can be clearer.
What's the difference between "I was highlighted" and "I was featured"?
"I was highlighted" suggests a general emphasis, while "I was featured" implies a more formal presentation or showcasing of your work or qualities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested