I was funded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was funded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing financial support or backing received for a project, initiative, or personal endeavor. Example: "After submitting my proposal, I was funded by several investors who believed in my vision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

A similar thing happened in 2001, when there were rumours spread that I was funded by Mossad.

The Guardian

"I was funded when I came," he wrote.

Science Magazine

I was funded on a grant for my Ph.D. work.

Science Magazine

Nested I was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals (to MEW).

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

This study: i) is funded by the National Institute for Health Research NIHRR) Programme Grant for Applied Research funding scheme, ii) is supported by an Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre grant (18139), and iii) is independent research arising from an In-Practice Fellowship Award commissioned by the NIHR.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

I was funding things myself".

The Guardian - Business

A Labour Leadership Candidate Is Being Funded By Corporate Lawyers for Austerity.

Vice

A Labour Deputy-Leader Candidate Is Being Funded by Corporate Lawyers for Austerity.

Vice

Follow Andrew DoLabour Twitter.

Vice

"I am funded by the N.I.H., and I'm worried.

The New Yorker

"The other ones say I'm funded by the government, the medical industry, and the drug cartel".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "I was funded" when you want to emphasize the fact that you received support for something you did. It puts the focus on your initiative rather than on who provided funds, which might be the case using "I received funding from".

Common error

Avoid overusing the passive voice (e.g., "I was funded") when an active voice construction (e.g., "I received funding") would be more direct and engaging for the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was funded" functions as a passive voice statement, indicating that the speaker received financial support. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "I was funded" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to indicate that an individual received financial support for a project, research, or other endeavor. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. While primarily neutral, it's more common in formal and scientific sources, offering a straightforward way to convey information about financial backing. Remember to be mindful of the passive voice and consider active alternatives for more engaging writing. As

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I received funding

Replaces the passive voice with an active construction, emphasizing the act of receiving.

Funding was provided to me

Shifts the focus to the funding itself, highlighting its provision.

I obtained financial support

Emphasizes the effort involved in acquiring the funding.

I secured funding

Highlights the competitive aspect of obtaining funds.

I was granted funds

Uses a more formal term ("granted") to indicate official approval.

My project was financed

Focuses on the project itself being supported rather than the speaker.

I was backed financially

Highlights the backing or support aspect of the funding.

I had sponsorship

Specifies the type of funding as sponsorship, implying a formal agreement.

Financial resources were allocated to me

More formal and passive, emphasizing the allocation process.

My work was subsidized

Implies partial financial support, often by a government or organization.

FAQs

What's a more formal way to say "I was funded"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "I received funding" or "funding was provided to me", which sound more professional and less conversational.

How does "I was funded" differ from "I am funded"?

"I was funded" implies that the funding occurred in the past, while "I am funded" suggests ongoing or current financial support. The choice depends on whether you're referring to a completed or continuing funding situation.

What can I say instead of "I was funded" to emphasize the source of the funding?

You can say "I was funded by [source]" to explicitly state the provider of the financial support. This is useful when the source is relevant to the context.

Is "I was funded" grammatically correct?

Yes, "I was funded" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice of the verb "fund" and is appropriate when the focus is on the fact that you received the funding rather than the entity that provided it.