Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I was evaluated with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of the sentence "I was evaluated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use this phrase to describe when someone has received an assessment, evaluation, or review. For example, "I was evaluated with an eye exam by my optometrist."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(16)
I underwent an evaluation using
My assessment involved using
The evaluation I received involved
I was subjected to evaluation via
I was appraised through
I was diagnosed with
I was educated with
I was estimated with
I was taken with
I was analyzed with
I was assessed with
I was measured with
I was given with
I was updated with
I was compared with
I was rewarded with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Similarly, the effect of reward on parameter B i was evaluated with a χ likelihood-ratio test to compare the full model with a nested model in which B i was not allowed to vary by reward: (3c) P PREF (C ) = 1 / (1 + e^ (− ((B 0 ) ((k 0 + α k 1 + β k 2 ) C + β ) + x 0 + α x 1 ) ) ). Model fitting was performed as described in previous sections.
Science
The existence of significant differences in the described indexes among MC I, MC II and MC I/II was evaluated with a rank-sum test or Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Knockdown of the GnRH-I receptor protein was evaluated with immune cytochemistry by using a monoclonal mouse anti-human GnRH-I receptor antibody (clone A9E4; Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ, USA) and immunoblotting by using a polyclonal rabbit antihuman GnRH-I receptor antiserum (Peptide Research Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany), as described previously [ 23].
Science
Diagnostic interviews were done with SCID-I, affective temperament was evaluated with the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego Autoquestionnaire, and resilience was evaluated with the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA).
Protein kinase C-βII (PKC-βII) activation was evaluated with Western blotting.
Each candidate solution v i is evaluated, and then compared with x i.
The correlation between HLA class I and class II expression was evaluated with Chi square test.
Science
To determine whether 1A6/DRIM functions in Pol I transcription, 47S rRNA level was evaluated with Northern blotting when 1A6/DRIM was silenced by siRNA.
Science
Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with I estimates.
Science
Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I 2 test.
Science
Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated with the I value and a χ-based Q test.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "I was evaluated with", clearly specify the tool, method, or criteria used in the evaluation to provide context and clarity.
Common error
Avoid vague descriptions of the evaluation method. Instead of saying, "I was evaluated with a standard test", specify the name or type of test used for better understanding.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I was evaluated with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject (I) received an evaluation. It is often followed by a description of the method or tool used in the evaluation. Ludwig provides examples where similar phrases are used to describe methods.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "I was evaluated with" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to describe a past assessment or judgment. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is valid in written English. Although not overwhelmingly common, it's frequently seen in science and academia, conveying information about evaluation methods. To enhance clarity, always specify the tool or method used in the evaluation. Keep in mind the advice to avoid vague descriptions. While the register is generally neutral, its formality depends on the specific context.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I underwent an evaluation using
Changes the verb to 'underwent' and rephrases 'was evaluated' to emphasize the process of evaluation.
I received an assessment with
Replaces 'evaluated' with 'assessment', focusing on the result of the evaluation.
My assessment involved using
Shifts the focus to the assessment itself and how it was performed.
The evaluation I received involved
Emphasizes the evaluation process and how it was conducted.
I was subjected to evaluation via
Uses 'subjected to' to convey a more formal tone and emphasizes the process of evaluation.
I was appraised through
Replaces "evaluated" with "appraised", and uses "through" to express the means of evaluation.
My performance was assessed with
Highlights performance as the subject of evaluation.
The method used to evaluate me was
Focuses on the method as the subject, rather than the individual.
They evaluated me utilizing
Changes to active voice emphasizing the evaluators and uses the more formal word "utilizing".
An evaluation was conducted on me using
Emphasizes the conducting of the evaluation as the key element.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "I was evaluated with"?
You can use alternatives such as "I underwent an evaluation using", "I received an assessment with", or "My assessment involved using" to convey a similar meaning.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing an evaluation?
Using active voice, like "They evaluated me with," can be more direct, while passive voice, such as "I was evaluated with", emphasizes the experience of being evaluated. Choose the voice that best suits the context and focus of your writing.
What's the difference between "I was evaluated with" and "I was assessed with"?
The terms "evaluated" and "assessed" are often interchangeable. However, "evaluated" might suggest a more in-depth or formal examination, while "assessed" can imply a more general or preliminary judgment. The best choice depends on the specific context of the evaluation.
What kind of information should I include after "I was evaluated with"?
After "I was evaluated with", specify the method, criteria, or tool used in the evaluation. For example, "I was evaluated with a standardized test", "I was evaluated with a performance review", or "I was evaluated with a peer assessment".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested