Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I was crashed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'I was crashed' is not correct and usable in written English.
To correctly use this phrase in written English, you would need to use the past participle form of the verb 'to crash': 'I was crashed into'. This phrase can be used to describe an instance in which someone or something was crashed into by another person or object. For example, "I was crashed into by a truck while I was crossing the street."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
I was crashed into, spun, tipped out, and constantly found the ball ripped from my grasp.
News & Media
"I was crashed against the boards, and that's how I got cut in the forehead," he said.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
"I had to be friendly with whoever was in the house; I was crashing," Ms. Tabak remembered.
News & Media
A couple of months ago I was crashing at my parent's house before moving out of the country.
News & Media
"The only pictures you saw of me when I was playing, I was crashing into a centre forward!" he says.
News & Media
But then, he was always a little cool -- even when I was crashing on his couch in South London almost two decades ago.
News & Media
She is writing a book largely on that subject — although, as she said last week, "I never felt like I was crashing.
News & Media
One morning, a friend on whose couch I was crashing walked out of his room while I was working my way through one of his overflowing bookshelves.
News & Media
She is writing a book largely on that subject although, as she said last week, "I never felt like I was crashing.
News & Media
I was crashing in the back on the electrolysis couch — someone's back-hair appointment had been cancelled — when they woke me up.
News & Media
I was crashing on a couch in Portland, Ore., with the Clicky Web Analytics guys back in 2008, and we were watching the live stream of a TechCrunch conference.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the passive voice construction "I was crashed". Instead, opt for active voice alternatives like "I crashed" or "I was in a crash" for clearer communication.
Common error
Do not assume that using a passive voice always sounds more formal or correct. In many cases, it obscures the meaning. Instead of "I was crashed", specify what you crashed into or use the active voice: "I crashed the car".
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I was crashed" is intended to describe being involved in a collision or accident. However, it's not standard English. While it attempts to convey a passive experience, Ludwig AI marks it as incorrect.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "I was crashed" attempts to describe being involved in a collision, it is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig. More appropriate and commonly used alternatives include "I crashed" or "I was in a crash". Given its infrequent usage and grammatical issues, it's best to avoid "I was crashed" in favor of clearer and more accepted phrasing. Ludwig AI's analysis emphasizes the importance of using grammatically sound expressions for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I was in a crash
Rephrases the experience as being involved in a collision event.
I got into a crash
Describes entering a collision, suggesting an accidental involvement.
I crashed
Omits the passive voice construction, using a direct active voice.
I had a crash
Indicates that an accident or collision occurred to the subject.
I collided
Focuses on the action of colliding with something else.
I was hit
Describes the event from the perspective of being struck by something.
I was rammed
Suggests a forceful impact where something drove into the speaker.
I was struck by
Specifies that something hit the subject, emphasizing the cause of the impact.
I experienced a collision
Formally describes being part of a collision event.
I suffered a crash
Highlights the negative outcome of a collision.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "I was crashed" to be grammatically correct?
Instead of "I was crashed", which isn't standard English, try "I crashed", "I was in a crash", or "I got into a crash". The best option depends on the context you want to convey.
What does it mean when someone says "I was crashed"?
While not grammatically correct, "I was crashed" likely means the speaker was involved in a collision or accident. A clearer way to express this would be to say /s/I+was+in+a+crash, or /s/I+crashed.
Is there a difference between "I crashed" and "I was crashed into"?
"I crashed" implies you were actively involved in causing the crash, while "I was crashed into" indicates someone or something else caused the crash. The phrase "I was crashed" is not grammatically correct. Consider rewording your sentence to use "I was crashed into" instead.
Which is more common, "I crashed" or "I was in a crash"?
"I was in a crash" and "I crashed" are much more common than "I was crashed". You might use /s/I+crashed if you caused the accident. The phrase "I was crashed" is not grammatically correct and should be avoided.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested